manimanc
Well-Known Member
Was expecting the end being they all got paid out and lived happily ever after. Can't believe it's still dragging on.
Was expecting the end being they all got paid out and lived happily ever after. Can't believe it's still dragging on.
I think it was appropriate action, IF ( and it is a big IF) someone was stealing. In these cases it would appear that very early on it was found that they were not stealing but those who could make the changed decided that overnight almost all sub postmasters had become thieves.It wasn’t “appropriate action”
So it wasn’t appropriate action because the people were NOT stealingI think it was appropriate action, IF ( and it is a big IF) someone was stealing. In these cases it would appear that very early on it was found that they were not stealing but those who could make the changed decided that overnight almost all sub postmasters had become thieves.
With the evidence given by the Post Office at the time of the trial they were found guilty of stealing. It turned out later that the evidence against was not truthful hence the miscarriage of justice.So it wasn’t appropriate action because the people were NOT stealing
It wasn’t “appropriate action”With the evidence given by the Post Office at the time of the trial they were found guilty of stealing. It turned out later that the evidence against was not truthful hence the miscarriage of justice.
I think we are in full agreement that these people are all innocent and the Post Office (us) behaved terribly.
It won’t.That was THE BEST OF TV. Sadly as awards are offered at the year end it may well be overlooked.