He attends remotely most of the time although he was present for the last 2 days.Why is the chair of the enquiry not actually at the enquiry?
He attends remotely most of the time although he was present for the last 2 days.Why is the chair of the enquiry not actually at the enquiry?
Because as with everything that involves multiple people all timings are approximate. Any lost time will be added at the end of the day.Supposed to be back at 11:10 yet it’s 11:15? WTF
Doesn’t show a great deal of commitment to such a serious issue that the chairman of the enquiry isn’t committed enough to be there the whole time.He attends remotely most of the time although he was present for the last 2 days.
Disagree. He explained yesterday that he couldn’t be there, but would be online. We don’t need to know the reason, but I certainly wouldn’t challenge his commitmentDoesn’t show a great deal of commitment to such a serious issue that the chairman of the enquiry isn’t committed enough to be there the whole time.
I think his commitment has better been demonstrated by his actions rather than where he attends from. For example his interim report on compensation. I also know that Sir Wynn has the full confidence of core participents.Doesn’t show a great deal of commitment to such a serious issue that the chairman of the enquiry isn’t committed enough to be there the whole time.
Not if she has been given financial promises over her pension and the bonuses she received. She ran the PO but was not aware of anything that was going on.Joining the dots still here and I still think the govn are at the bottom of this scandal. I wonder if she will drop them in it soon.