Interesting column, but I am still worried about all this 'he said...', 'she said...', 'a source said...' nonsense. With Hughes or against him, it really is hard to extrapolate the real hard facts and truth of this whole saga.vbr said:http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/jan/05/manchester-city-mark-hughes-player-revolt
That is taking it all a bit too far, but rightly or wrongly I can see what Hughes is trying to do. He's trying to turn it into a bootcamp. A no-nonsense training base. I agree that the poor security guard should be allowed a couple of City posters up, really don't see the problem, but I agree with the rest of what Hughes is trying to put in place.vbr said:Even the fellow in the security cabin was told to take down his Manchester City posters and Ricky Hatton memorabilia because Hughes felt it created the wrong impression.
What's wrong with the security lad having a few City posters up? Jesus.
Right, this is happening too often now: stories ('rumours') appearing on Bluemoon one minute and then in the press the next.vbr said:http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/jan/05/manchester-city-mark-hughes-player-revolt
Daniel Sturridge said:I was sitting on the fence whether I wanted Hughes to stay or go but now after reading all these rumours it all makes sense now that some of the players are being complete pricks and very unproffesional and now Hughes will get my full backing whilst he gets rid of the bad apples.
Disturbance said:Hughes' PR has done it's job then. These stories are obviously being leaked from inside the club. Hughes has delivered appalling results up to now and does not have a trophy-winning CV to fall back on therefore he is trying to appease the fans by blaming it all on player in fighting. It seems to me he cares more about his own reputation than dragging the club's name through the mud.