toffee balls said:Dctid
Sorry fella
Just relax pal.
If it's meant to happen ,it will.
I have been on here for many years and have struggled Luke fuck
To get to my posts total
dctid said:southern muppet said:dctid said:if the deal had been done they could make a similar announcement is subject to blah blah blah and wait for a couple of days and complete - the deal aint been done ansd it is unlikely that the tming of this transfer is being timed becuase of his CL suspension
whatever happens Nasri will be top of the "to do" list
Why's that unlikely? The difference between Nasri being available for our first CL game or not probably means a lot to Mancini - what if it's against Barca? what if Silva happens to be injured? There's no point getting him in two days early when he can't play tomorrow anyway, at the expense of that.
Making the kind of announcement they just did for Fabregas isn't standard practice, it's done in situations like that where they think it would be helpful to have a resolution, for reasons of not distracting the team and allow everyone else to focus having had some clarity etc - Nasri doesn't carry that same weight so there's nothing in it for them to do that/let us do that.
Did Mancini not say that he wanted signings asap - pretty certyain he did
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/aug/12/roberto-mancini-manchester-city-samir-nasri" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011 ... amir-nasri</a>
there are some direct quote there which would seem to indicate that your post in inaccurate
southern muppet said:dctid said:southern muppet said:Why's that unlikely? The difference between Nasri being available for our first CL game or not probably means a lot to Mancini - what if it's against Barca? what if Silva happens to be injured? There's no point getting him in two days early when he can't play tomorrow anyway, at the expense of that.
Making the kind of announcement they just did for Fabregas isn't standard practice, it's done in situations like that where they think it would be helpful to have a resolution, for reasons of not distracting the team and allow everyone else to focus having had some clarity etc - Nasri doesn't carry that same weight so there's nothing in it for them to do that/let us do that.
Did Mancini not say that he wanted signings asap - pretty certyain he did
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/aug/12/roberto-mancini-manchester-city-samir-nasri" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011 ... amir-nasri</a>
there are some direct quote there which would seem to indicate that your post in inaccurate
Yeah, he probably would have liked Nasri, and others, in weeks ago
But NOW we don't have that option and the choice we are faced with is get him in now with a suspension, or get him in two days without a suspension.
It's worth more to us to wait a couple days.
bluematt9 said:With nasri in the side this is the team id play if we came up against barca.
.........................................hart....................................
........richards.........kompany...........savic.........clichy.........
.......................................de jong..................................
........aguero............yaya.....................silva...........nasri...
.......................................tevez....................................
BlueJill said:bzekosilva said:Midlothian Blue said:I'm sure the deal will be done Wednesday morning after Nasri's CL suspension has passed.
Dont panic!
THIS
I have yet to get a good explanation to this. Doesn't the fact that he is on the squad and they play a game and he can't play because of suspension cuptie him?
City, who take on newly-promoted Swansea City at Eastlands on Monday, remain locked in talks with Arsenal over a deal for the French international midfielder, with sources acquainted with negotiations confident an agreement on the structure of payment is edging closer.
Personal terms are not expected to pose a problem, with Nasri primed to sign a £185,000-a-week, five-year contract.
LoveCity said:Telegraph:
City, who take on newly-promoted Swansea City at Eastlands on Monday, remain locked in talks with Arsenal over a deal for the French international midfielder, with sources acquainted with negotiations confident an agreement on the structure of payment is edging closer.
Personal terms are not expected to pose a problem, with Nasri primed to sign a £185,000-a-week, five-year contract.
No, being cup-tied specifically refers to players actually taking the field of play, even non-playing subs aren't cup-tied. See section 18.07 in the link:BlueJill said:bzekosilva said:Midlothian Blue said:I'm sure the deal will be done Wednesday morning after Nasri's CL suspension has passed.
Dont panic!
THIS
I have yet to get a good explanation to this. Doesn't the fact that he is on the squad and they play a game and he can't play because of suspension cuptie him?