Nathan Ake

More links coming out on who City might replace Ake with..


I like the bit about Gvardiol being fourth choice starter if he comes "at best". I don't think that means what they think it means.
 
I think you are right to an extent. I think he was slightly injured, but could have played if called upon. I think with only having two left footed CB's, Pep rather had gone with Fernandinho. Ake can only play on the left and Laporte isn't as good on the right. Also Laporte is needed for his build up play so Pep made the call to put Dinho in instead of Ake. That's my opinion anyway.
He is a decent defender, loyal and never lets you down but when we are in possession he is a significant step down from our other CB's and 90% of the time we have the ball, so he is a weakness.
 
Cucurella has played as fullback, so has Phillips, not sure why would need a like for like replacement.
We may move to 5 at the back in which case a full on option would be needed. Otherwise, if we sign Cuckoo we should be covered.
 
Cucurella has played as fullback, so has Phillips, not sure why would need a like for like replacement.
We may move to 5 at the back in which case a full on option would be needed. Otherwise, if we sign Cuckoo we should be covered.
Not a chance we play 5 at the back to many top class midfielders wudnt get a game.
 
Agree but with Pep who knows. With 5 subs he may come up with some weird in-play NFL Special Teams weird shit ....lol
You say lol, but that’s actually a very good point.

Pep likes his players to be flexible and with the 5 subs, who knows how many formations he could spring on the opposition in 96 minutes!
 
Not a chance we play 5 at the back to many top class midfielders wudnt get a game.
I agree we won’t be playing 3 at the back, it’s not the Pep way. I know Pep changes style of play each season but it is always based on control and proactive football.

3 at the back really means 5 at the back and a defensive but aggressive counter attacking style. We simply have too many creative players and midfielders In particular to play that on a consistent basis.
 
I agree we won’t be playing 3 at the back, it’s not the Pep way. I know Pep changes style of play each season but it is always based on control and proactive football.

3 at the back really means 5 at the back and a defensive but aggressive counter attacking style. We simply have too many creative players and midfielders In particular to play that on a consistent basis.

Possibly at klanfield?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.