From what I’ve read PVV got more votes than the last two elections winners (governments). I wouldn’t say stunning, but a far right party winning the majority of seats is pretty seismic
Not if there is one far right party with 37 seats and ten not far right parties with 113. 25% of people would still vote for the far right party in Britain.From what I’ve read PVV got more votes than the last two elections winners (governments). I wouldn’t say stunning, but a far right party winning the majority of seats is pretty seismic
Alright. I'll leave that one there.That's like saying you're an avocado because I called you one. Witches ain't real immigrants are. It twas that simple.
Left wing grifters absolutely can do the same thing, and the history of the 20th century shows that you can just as equally have a far left revolution as a far right one. I've seen just as many anti-BBC left wingers in recent weeks because of the war in Palestine as I saw anti-BBC right-wingers through covid, for example.As for your second point people are easily influenced and stupid people more so. Why do these people get conned by the mail and Tommy two cells and not the the mirror and Gallaway for instance?
Why cant the intelligent scorners fool these stupid folk. Its not a closed club for the right only to talk shite.
Katie **** ebdorsing him and pictures of him with timmy little cock has the half dozen BM right wingers all excitable I see.
What a waste of spunk some of you are.
Who mentioned fault? Katie and Tommy are two of the most despicable people currently polluting the U.K. and they look like they are endorsing the newest fruit loop vying for power.Not very nice is it?
Politician wins an election in Holland and it’s all the fault of a few posters on here?
Get a grip man.
Who mentioned fault? Katie and Tommy are two of the most despicable people currently polluting the U.K. and they look like they are endorsing the newest fruit loop vying for power.
We then have the half dozen right wingers who are all over every similar thread reminding us just how right wing they are and it gives me the perfect opportunity to call them out for what they are. It’ll never be something nice.
My grip is fully got thanks.
It's ironic to mention the commerciality of various media. The Guardian for example is a leading left-leaning newspaper and you have to pay to read their articles, talk about accessibility! It seems to me that the more right leaning media is more popular not because of influence but because more people are interested in their content, and often that content is not political.Alright. I'll leave that one there.
Left wing grifters absolutely can do the same thing, and the history of the 20th century shows that you can just as equally have a far left revolution as a far right one. I've seen just as many anti-BBC left wingers in recent weeks because of the war in Palestine as I saw anti-BBC right-wingers through covid, for example.
The difference in our current society though, is that there's not the commercial incentive to push left wing ideals. There might be an incentive for individual people like Galloway, and specific organisations like Just Stop Oil. But those with money and power prefer the low taxation, low regulation, free market, right wing agenda, and they also happen to be major donors to political parties and major advertisers in the media. As a result, they are able to massively influence the discourse of public life. Not just what we should think about X, Y and Z, but whether they even get talked about at all.
It's been a while since I've read an article on there, but I can't remember ever encountering a paywall on The Guardian website. Meanwhile, the Times, Telegraph and Sun all operate paywalls for their content and were definitely the first to do so out of all the big papers in the UK.It's ironic to mention the commerciality of various media. The Guardian for example is a leading left-leaning newspaper and you have to pay to read their articles, talk about accessibility! It seems to me that the more right leaning media is more popular not because of influence but because more people are interested in their content.
Looking at it I don't think that actually the Guardian has a paywall but it does have a begging bowl.It's been a while since I've read an article on there, but I can't remember ever encountering a paywall on The Guardian website. Meanwhile, the Times, Telegraph and Sun all operate paywalls for their content and were definitely the first to do so out of all the big papers in the UK.