Dipsis_LTU_MC
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 Jun 2013
- Messages
- 1,327
When player wears shirt it looks 100 times better. Don't judge the shirt when it's lying on the sofa ;D.
Agree, neck looks like you could fit a horses head through it. Shirt looks baggy (all the fat fucks will be pleased), and it looks like it will wrinkle and crease to fuck and I hate ironingChicagoBlue said:kevin1987 said:Think this guy needs a refund on the name on the back!
It's the neck on the front I would be most concerned about! Looks pretty big!
ballinio said:Abysmal, up there with the worst kit we`ve ever had. just not Manchester City.
YOU LOOK LIKE YOUR HAVING A MASSIVE SHITMr Rich said:ballinio said:Abysmal, up there with the worst kit we`ve ever had. just not Manchester City.
Well the most likely result is that we become the focus of all any of their marketing linked to the Premier League, so it could definitely benefit us indirectly. Personally, I can't stand them as a company or their products.LoveCity said:Now that Nike are walking away from United (United asking £60m+ per season, Nike say no so, looks like Adidas could take them on), City are the only major Premier League club to be partnered with them. The other is QPR who have no brand power.
So in return for wearing these abominations every year, can City ask for an improved deal? I hope there is a renegotiation clause or we're stuck with £12m a year from Nike while United get over £60m from Adidas or Warrior.
Sportswear giant Nike paid just £1 million in tax over the past five years on £100 million sales of its Manchester United replica kits.
The company funnelled nearly £40m over the period to its Dutch business despite making most of its money on sales to football fans in the UK, according to accounts filed with Companies House.
The legal loophole saw the total tax bill in the UK for Manchester United Merchandising, which is jointly run by Nike and the football club, reduced to just £255,000 last year after an £8.3m royalty fee was paid to its Dutch subsidiary.
Similar payments have been made for at least the past five years.
It means the taxman missed out on a potential £9.1m over the period from the England football kit makers and leaves Nike the latest in a line of US companies facing scrutiny for their tax affairs in Europe.
urban genie said:Nike are just tossers as much as I think this new Inter shirt is a nice shirt, to me it ain't Inter Milan, an should not be used as their home shirt, fucking about with tradition for no reason
[bigimg]http://metrouk2.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/inter-milan.jpg?w=650&h=494&crop=1#038;h=673[/bigimg]
Our shirt is bobbins in my opinion if the V neck actually met up in the centre the collar may have looked ok but it's just shite, and with them shorts it just doesn't do it for me, to be fair though I don't buy replica kit every time one comes out, only if I like them and normally just for holidays or dossing about the house, never for match days, so I suppose my opinion isn't worth much in the whole.
Also I hope the rags don't get Adidas i may have to bin me Beckenbauer's and sambas