Hang on - Sergio is getting enough stick in his performance threadModelled by the invisible man too.
Hang on - Sergio is getting enough stick in his performance threadModelled by the invisible man too.
That looks like they were actually sponsoring the wife's fitness business, have you any evidence they sponsor hunting?Under Armour are "dedicated to the hunting community."
I certainly won't be buying any of their products.
http://fortune.com/2016/08/22/under-armour-sponsorship-bowmar/
That looks like they were actually sponsoring the wife's fitness business, have you any evidence they sponsor hunting?
according to the latest "study", we sell about 100k more shirts than Spurs. So if they get £25m, we should be getting £35m-£40m, as we sell more now + the gap is going to be bigger every year as we have more high profile players + City is way more likely to compete for top honours year after year instead of the occasional year, like Spurs.How many shirts do we sell in comparison to Spurs and Chelsea? From a branding perspective, I think City represents a huge opportunity for every manufacturer given our style of football and squad. However, from memory we don't shift as many shirts as those clubs, which I would imagine is the main driver behind how much Nike et al would be willing to pay us.
I quite like the design of the home and away kits, but not a fan of the stencil approach that Nike seems to apply to most kits at the moment.
No I don't. But their own spokesperson saying they are "dedicated to the hunting community" is distasteful at best, and enough to discourage me.That looks like they were actually sponsoring the wife's fitness business, have you any evidence they sponsor hunting?