ElanJo
Well-Known Member
Ken Shabby said:Came across these from a (usually) reliable source. But don't quote me!
Blue = Very good
White = Gorgeous
Black = Shite.
Ken Shabby said:Came across these from a (usually) reliable source. But don't quote me!
mad4city said:Sorry, I know it seems to be everyone else's favourite but, is it just me or is that black shirt not at all dissimilar to something that a certain club out Salford direction wore about ten years ago?
Cal said:mad4city said:Sorry, I know it seems to be everyone else's favourite but, is it just me or is that black shirt not at all dissimilar to something that a certain club out Salford direction wore about ten years ago?
Well they did have a black shirt with white and gold on it - but so have Pompey and Spuds...and loads others, so not a biggie really.
we are from lancashire and allways will be just because some civil servent moved the boundary in the 70,s means fuck all my grandad will be turning in is grave ,used to say to me just thank god you wasnt born in yorkshire i am 53 born and raised in denton,greater manchester was just invented by some twat sat at a desk in whitehall,manchester is in lancsphoenixxblue said:Why are people obsessed with the older badge? The current badge (disregarding the eagle bit) is basically, the crest of THE CITY OF MANCHESTER. The old badge features (in place of the three rivers of Manchester) the red rose of Lancashire. I know that Manchester was, historically, part of Lancashire but ask any Mancunian under the age of about 50 and they will not regard themselves as Lancastrians.
For me:
MANCHESTER = CITY
LANCASHIRE = Blackburn, Preston, Blackpool, pie eating etc.
I dont want a red rose on the badge!
frothy said:just because some civil servent moved the boundary in the 70,s means fuck all
ok explainwarpig said:frothy said:just because some civil servent moved the boundary in the 70,s means fuck all
erm yes it does. get over it
i do tooDobsy87 said:I prefer the new badge. BAAAAAAAAH!
Tin hat.