W
W
worsleyweb
Guest
Why didn't we buy VVD!?
Amongst other reasons the main one was Southampton decided to make a stand and he wasn't for sale, same reason Chelsea or anyone else didn't buy him.Why didn't we buy VVD!?
Why didn't we buy VVD!?
Yeah, selfish fucker wanting to captain his country in a world cup finals.I'm afraid if vinny can't see he needs to step away from international football his career at city is coming to a sad end
Pep will ship him out
Guess we wanted to add a little bit of entertainment by Stones-Otamendi comedy show.Why didn't we buy VVD!?
I am really getting pissed off with this media focus on our defence, particularly this issue of Kompany and his injuries, that is taking proportions of psychological warfare against us. The current champions Chelsea conceded 33 to our 39 goals, but you would be excused to think we shipped 120 at least listening to Keown, Dixon, Carragher and Co. We had almost the same number of infamous tackles like them; better ratio of ball clearances than them, even managed to have 2 penalties saved. But you never hear statistic that was our real problem: Chelsea scored 85 out of 580 shots (ratio 6.82), while we managed meagre 80 out of 633 (ratio 7.91). The big chances missed, Chelsea 32, us 48!!! Even at hitting the post, us 20, them f..ers 17. Our real problem was that in attack we were shadows of the team that won two titles. There was only one person who was banging about this game in game out, Pep Guardiola. But he is only our manager, what the hell does he know?
Spot-on. We conceded less chances than any team last season but everytime someone shot Bravo let it in. We had the third best defence in terms of goals conceded...pretty good considering how much we attack. It is true we are vulnerable at set pieces...but not as much as Liverpool.I am really getting pissed off with this media focus on our defence, particularly this issue of Kompany and his injuries, that is taking proportions of psychological warfare against us. The current champions Chelsea conceded 33 to our 39 goals, but you would be excused to think we shipped 120 at least listening to Keown, Dixon, Carragher and Co. We had almost the same number of infamous tackles like them; better ratio of ball clearances than them, even managed to have 2 penalties saved. But you never hear statistic that was our real problem: Chelsea scored 85 out of 580 shots (ratio 6.82), while we managed meagre 80 out of 633 (ratio 7.91). The big chances missed, Chelsea 32, us 48!!! Even at hitting the post, us 20, them f..ers 17. Our real problem was that in attack we were shadows of the team that won two titles. There was only one person who was banging about this game in game out, Pep Guardiola. But he is only our manager, what the hell does he know?
You cannot know all that.Some say it's because he only wants Liverpool.
I say 'my arse' to that. He'd be here like a shot & Southampton would sell at the right price.
It's because we kept the money to buy more attackers.
He will cost more if we do end up buying him, than if we'd moved straight in.