I'm With Stupid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 May 2013
- Messages
- 20,537
You should be grateful your team get to experience the 'famous' Anfield atmosphere once a year, and see a dodgy penalty given against you at the Theatre of Dreams.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
New League wide financial system.
- Thread starter mancity dan
- Start date
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,373
So Arsenal, Chelsea, Tottenham, Liverpool, Villa, West Ham, Wolves, Palace, Bournemouth and Forest didn't want the proposed EFL deal.
Interesting that City were fine with it, more interesting that United apparently were (maybe Ratcliffe is bringing a change - judge what they do, not what they say).
Pretty ironic some clubs (wonder who?) were threatening to sue the IR if a solution is imposed :) Damn clubs with their expensive lawyers.
If ever there was a solution that should be based on a % of a club's revenue, this is it. Not some idiot cost control measure that the usual suspects favoured. Arseholes.
Interesting that City were fine with it, more interesting that United apparently were (maybe Ratcliffe is bringing a change - judge what they do, not what they say).
Pretty ironic some clubs (wonder who?) were threatening to sue the IR if a solution is imposed :) Damn clubs with their expensive lawyers.
If ever there was a solution that should be based on a % of a club's revenue, this is it. Not some idiot cost control measure that the usual suspects favoured. Arseholes.
ChicagoBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 18,656
Answer is SIMPLE.
ALL CLUBS under UEFA should have a spending limit…the SAME LIMIT. No club can exceed it. That limit is a % of the average revenues of the clubs in that league/division for the previous reporting year.
Making it a % of each individual club’s revenue only allows the big clubs to get bigger and the smaller clubs more unable to compete.
If top club earns $20M and next club $19M, $18M and so on, all the way to the bottom club making only 1M in revenues. If you average the revenues you get $10.5M. If total spend was set at a % of that, some clubs could max it out, others might be under it, but it would be the same limits for everyone and not the sliding scale that currently allows the biggest clubs to get even bigger.
TV revenues should be shared EQUALLY between every team in a division.
Away tickets set at 10% of home capacity and £20 per ticket, no exceptions.
Beyond that, there could be a sustainability fee, based on “excess revenues” that funded football, from the grassroots up, an infrastructure fund that helped clubs improve their stadia and access infrastructure, and a set of high minimum standards for stadia across the country.
ALL CLUBS under UEFA should have a spending limit…the SAME LIMIT. No club can exceed it. That limit is a % of the average revenues of the clubs in that league/division for the previous reporting year.
Making it a % of each individual club’s revenue only allows the big clubs to get bigger and the smaller clubs more unable to compete.
If top club earns $20M and next club $19M, $18M and so on, all the way to the bottom club making only 1M in revenues. If you average the revenues you get $10.5M. If total spend was set at a % of that, some clubs could max it out, others might be under it, but it would be the same limits for everyone and not the sliding scale that currently allows the biggest clubs to get even bigger.
TV revenues should be shared EQUALLY between every team in a division.
Away tickets set at 10% of home capacity and £20 per ticket, no exceptions.
Beyond that, there could be a sustainability fee, based on “excess revenues” that funded football, from the grassroots up, an infrastructure fund that helped clubs improve their stadia and access infrastructure, and a set of high minimum standards for stadia across the country.
I'm With Stupid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 May 2013
- Messages
- 20,537
And bring back the 20% of gate receipts for the away team while we're at it. But let's be honest, the big clubs will throw their toys out of the pram again if any of those measures are brought in.Answer is SIMPLE.
ALL CLUBS under UEFA should have a spending limit…the SAME LIMIT. No club can exceed it. That limit is a % of the average revenues of the clubs in that league/division for the previous reporting year.
Making it a % of each individual club’s revenue only allows the big clubs to get bigger and the smaller clubs more unable to compete.
If top club earns $20M and next club $19M, $18M and so on, all the way to the bottom club making only 1M in revenues. If you average the revenues you get $10.5M. If total spend was set at a % of that, some clubs could max it out, others might be under it, but it would be the same limits for everyone and not the sliding scale that currently allows the biggest clubs to get even bigger.
TV revenues should be shared EQUALLY between every team in a division.
Away tickets set at 10% of home capacity and £20 per ticket, no exceptions.
Beyond that, there could be a sustainability fee, based on “excess revenues” that funded football, from the grassroots up, an infrastructure fund that helped clubs improve their stadia and access infrastructure, and a set of high minimum standards for stadia across the country.
the blue panther
Well-Known Member
Scummy Jim's just hedging his bets, as he can now see what a pile of scum he's bought, and fears that it's heading back to the EFL in a year or 2.So Arsenal, Chelsea, Tottenham, Liverpool, Villa, West Ham, Wolves, Palace, Bournemouth and Forest didn't want the proposed EFL deal.
Interesting that City were fine with it, more interesting that United apparently were (maybe Ratcliffe is bringing a change - judge what they do, not what they say)........
Scum.
ChicagoBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 18,656
Only needs 14 votes!And bring back the 20% of gate receipts for the away team while we're at it. But let's be honest, the big clubs will throw their toys out of the pram again if any of those measures are brought in.
Is that what they do in USA?Answer is SIMPLE.
ALL CLUBS under UEFA should have a spending limit…the SAME LIMIT. No club can exceed it. That limit is a % of the average revenues of the clubs in that league/division for the previous reporting year.
Making it a % of each individual club’s revenue only allows the big clubs to get bigger and the smaller clubs more unable to compete.
If top club earns $20M and next club $19M, $18M and so on, all the way to the bottom club making only 1M in revenues. If you average the revenues you get $10.5M. If total spend was set at a % of that, some clubs could max it out, others might be under it, but it would be the same limits for everyone and not the sliding scale that currently allows the biggest clubs to get even bigger.
TV revenues should be shared EQUALLY between every team in a division.
Away tickets set at 10% of home capacity and £20 per ticket, no exceptions.
Beyond that, there could be a sustainability fee, based on “excess revenues” that funded football, from the grassroots up, an infrastructure fund that helped clubs improve their stadia and access infrastructure, and a set of high minimum standards for stadia across the country.
mexico1970
Well-Known Member
Is that what they do in USA?
It's the same argument that athletes who can afford or get sponsored to train at altitude for months shouldn't be allowed because they have an unfair advantage.
All sports are unequal that's the nature of the beast, those silly Americans with their draft picks and wage caps will be the death of us if we don't fuck them off.
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
it cant be right buying more players on the drip when already maxed out on that facilityWell if going off the past 3 seasons United have made losses so how could they spend money before reducing the debt as well? Allowing clubs to only spend 85% of revenue should only be for clubs that are not in debt, Clubs in debt should be made to pay off their debt first
if rags or anybody in debt wants new toy then money up front if need players or sell to buy
someone will put it better than me but you get what saying
Salford_Blue
Well-Known Member
You need to log into Twitter then pal. Loads of experts on there giving free advice...honest!Fuck me, you need a PhD in contract law and accountancy to be a football fan now!!! Can't keep up with all this.