Chelsea. They had one main weakness and dealt with it with a single good signing. Obviously if by "improved" we mean "bought a shitload of big name players" then of course they did best.Which team improved more than they did?
I definitely agree right now Chelsea is a better team than PSG. They were “ready”. We’ll see at the end of the season if Poch was able to fulfill the squad’s promiseChelsea. They had one main weakness and dealt with it with a single good signing. Obviously if by "improved" we mean "bought a shitload of big name players" then of course they did best.
But who do Everton replace him with?They will very possibly sell Richarlison to PSG in the remaining days, you watch
But that wasn’t my point. I only hypothetically mentioned him. I think if the club leaked early that X is our target, most here would start accepting it, whoever that was
MaupayBut who do Everton replace him with?
Richarlson is a big player to lose this late in the window.
Didn't Torres make loads of runs that no one passes to? That said Sterling made some lovely runs that were found so if he was a natural striker he'd score loads more.A striker tends to move into positions which a midfielder won't. That's why it's important to get the right striker.
That'll be a "no thanks", no value whatsoever in thatWhat about Aubamalan ,sorry about spelling.he was a top flight striker looked so pissed off today. I'm sure he'd score a shed full if Pep could remotivate him
Oh my - we'll go with what we have before these 2.I wonder how much west ham would want for Antonio, or maybe Traore at Wolves?