New striker?

[CookiesForCream]

Kane isn’t good enough to fit in our slick team. I would rather see Haaland. He’s young, eager, and would rather see £100M+ on him as we will see mileage out of him.

 

[Barcon]

I'd rather have herpes all over my face than see Kane play for us.

 

[Spurs quarter 69]

Wish we'd got Maxwell Cornet before Burnley, the Ivorian got four against us for Lyon so can't be bad. Has made a vast difference to the Clarets

 

[bennyboy]

Kane isn’t good enough to fit in our slick team. I would rather see Haaland. He’s young, eager, and would rather see £100M+ on him as we will see mileage out of him.

£800,000 a week.No danger.

 

[Pingu the Penguin]

All depends on who is available dunnit

 

[Deleted member 87819]

£800,000 a week.No danger.

Incorrect

 

[Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese]

I'd rather have herpes all over my face than see Kane play for us.

Agreed, I would also rather you had herpes all over your face.

 

[richards30]

depends in how we are fixed in the league etc imo. With the dippers going to lose salah and mane for possibly 6 weeks then if we are fully in the hunt for the title common sense would be to use them pair going as a catalyst to splash in january to try and pull away from them if they struggle?

 

[cucumberman]

The conundrum here is our expectation of a lethal striker is set so high because we had Aguero.

Most obvious is Haaland, but I would absolutely love it if we could find another Aguero. When we bought Aguero, not many knew that he would set the football world on fire because they were many established strikers around those years 2008-2010. Even with Aguero scoring goals for Atletico, eyes were on Eto'o, Messi, Ibrahimovic, Torres, Villa, Drogba.

 

[citytill1die84]

If we can get Kane or Haaland then yes if its some makeshift then no.