D
D
Deleted member 87819
Guest
Has to be. Don’t see Inter letting Lukaku go and Ings not good enough. And age an issue with bothIngs and Lukaku must be a txiki double pivot smokescreen....
Has to be. Don’t see Inter letting Lukaku go and Ings not good enough. And age an issue with bothIngs and Lukaku must be a txiki double pivot smokescreen....
It may be just me with limited games I’m seen him play but I think he is not good enough for us. He would struggle with our team moving the ball quicker and needing to work a packed defence.Ings wouldn`t make any sense at all. He thrives in Southampton since they`re a defensive side and he has acres of space to run into and use his pace, something he wouldn`t be able to do here. Nothing from what I`ve seen from him would make me believe he`s a good fit here. His passing, dribbling and link up play look below par, and he`s injury prone and already 28. Hopefully just some smokescreen for another target
I've grown to rate The Athletic for the in depth analysis pieces (most of the time), but I don't trust anyone at all over there regarding transfer speculation relating to City.
Can you read? It says if we sign 2 strikers.There’s no way we’re replacing our best ever striker with 28 year old injury prone Danny Fucking Ings. Should be either Haaland or Jovic