I'm not talking about Yaya playing in DeBruyne's position I'm talking about him playing atracking mid thus having someone to feed DeBruyne Aguero & Navas & also help in centre mid. Rather than having Delph tripping over his feet on the wing. The change to DeBruyns's play wiuld he minimal, as you have rightly pointed out that he doesn't stay upfront all the time.
What did our manager do? Fucking put him on the wing in order to weaken the team further by putting on Bony & a half fit Sterling BUT MOST IMORTANTLY KEEPING THE SAME FORMATION. Exactly as I predicted in the match thread.
Who's plan is best? His, moving DeBruyne to the wing, or mine puttng Yaya centre mid & moving DeBruyne a across a little bit ? Then of course from the bench we have Fernandinho who could replace Yaya at centre. But no, we have Bony instead because it's the only way this bloke plays.
I guess you are looking at Pellegrini's fantastic record for using young players as evidence that he didn't decide to prefer his mate Demichelis to Denayer ? Don't think a jury would buy it.
And as for 'building a team' for Pellegrini. No. Not 4222 no. It would set us back fucking decades.
He has a squad. A great squad And his job as manager is to get the best from it. Not to destroy it for an experiment in tactics.
See, you are impossible to talk with. Who said Sterling is half fit? You've stated it as fact.
There's no point discussing anything, you continually offer your opinion as fact. Toure has been largely awful in an advanced role. The system you are suggesting is the one torn apart at Spurs.
So your answer is no better. The system and players in it you suggest got battered at Spurs. There was one difference though. Fernandinho was playing in place of Delph argiably making us much stronger. So your answer is flawed.