Newcastle Vs City Post Match Thread

carlosthejackal said:
If we had scored that goal and had it dissallowed this board would have been in meltdown, we got away with one, lets move on to the next game.




at the game i thought the same,


BUT


if gouffran stays still the ball hits him and probably stops the ball from ending up in the net and he`s deemed active and offside, if moves out of the way of a shot allowing the ball to go passed him into the net surely he becomes active as soon as he moves out of the way of the shot
 
It went absolutely mental after Negredo scored in the away end, great noise made from the fans. A great win that shows real title credentials, and the type of game it was, was one that we may not necessarily have come away with three points in previous years (or early this season) which I think explained the sheer ecstasy when the goal went in. Great Character shown by the team.
 
Beermonster said:
It went absolutely mental after Negredo scored in the away end, great noise made from the fans. A great win that shows real title credentials, and the type of game it was, was one that we may not necessarily have come away with three points in previous years (or early this season) which I think explained the sheer ecstasy when the goal went in. Great Character shown by the team.

When we played there in 2012 and won 2-0 (good ol' Yaya) it was the same, I genuinely believed we had won the title that day.... What all we needed to do was beat QPR - what could possibly go wrong?
 
r.soleofsalford said:
carlosthejackal said:
If we had scored that goal and had it dissallowed this board would have been in meltdown, we got away with one, lets move on to the next game.




at the game i thought the same,


BUT


if gouffran stays still the ball hits him and probably stops the ball from ending up in the net and he`s deemed active and offside, if moves out of the way of a shot allowing the ball to go passed him into the net surely he becomes active as soon as he moves out of the way of the shot
Exactly. If he'd stayed where he was, the ball would have hit him and either deflected in, in which case he'd have been offside, or stayed out, in which case still offside but no goal. By moving, he allowed the ball to go in and was therefore interfering.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
r.soleofsalford said:
carlosthejackal said:
If we had scored that goal and had it dissallowed this board would have been in meltdown, we got away with one, lets move on to the next game.




at the game i thought the same,


BUT


if gouffran stays still the ball hits him and probably stops the ball from ending up in the net and he`s deemed active and offside, if moves out of the way of a shot allowing the ball to go passed him into the net surely he becomes active as soon as he moves out of the way of the shot
Exactly. If he'd stayed where he was, the ball would have hit him and either deflected in, in which case he'd have been offside, or stayed out, in which case still offside but no goal. By moving, he allowed the ball to go in and was therefore interfering.
not according to mike dennis, mark chapman, robbie savage and alan wiley currently on Monday Night Club
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
r.soleofsalford said:
carlosthejackal said:
If we had scored that goal and had it dissallowed this board would have been in meltdown, we got away with one, lets move on to the next game.




at the game i thought the same,


BUT


if gouffran stays still the ball hits him and probably stops the ball from ending up in the net and he`s deemed active and offside, if moves out of the way of a shot allowing the ball to go passed him into the net surely he becomes active as soon as he moves out of the way of the shot
Exactly. If he'd stayed where he was, the ball would have hit him and either deflected in, in which case he'd have been offside, or stayed out, in which case still offside but no goal. By moving, he allowed the ball to go in and was therefore interfering.

This is the blindingly obvious fact that seems to have escaped all the so called experts employed as pundits.
 
mammutly said:
Prestwich_Blue said:
r.soleofsalford said:
at the game i thought the same,


BUT


if gouffran stays still the ball hits him and probably stops the ball from ending up in the net and he`s deemed active and offside, if moves out of the way of a shot allowing the ball to go passed him into the net surely he becomes active as soon as he moves out of the way of the shot
Exactly. If he'd stayed where he was, the ball would have hit him and either deflected in, in which case he'd have been offside, or stayed out, in which case still offside but no goal. By moving, he allowed the ball to go in and was therefore interfering.

This is the blindingly obvious fact that seems to have escaped all the so called experts employed as pundits.

Glad some folks on here actually understand the rules. I was getting pretty angry reading all of the comments on this thread agreeing with those cheating twats.<br /><br />-- Mon Jan 13, 2014 3:49 pm --<br /><br />
carlosthejackal said:
If we had scored that goal and had it dissallowed this board would have been in meltdown, we got away with one, lets move on to the next game.


Bull Shit. Proper call. Don't post if you are this ignorant about the rules.
 
FrancoisToure said:
mammutly said:
Prestwich_Blue said:
Exactly. If he'd stayed where he was, the ball would have hit him and either deflected in, in which case he'd have been offside, or stayed out, in which case still offside but no goal. By moving, he allowed the ball to go in and was therefore interfering.

This is the blindingly obvious fact that seems to have escaped all the so called experts employed as pundits.

Glad some folks on here actually understand the rules. I was getting pretty angry reading all of the comments on this thread agreeing with those cheating twats.

-- Mon Jan 13, 2014 3:49 pm --

carlosthejackal said:
If we had scored that goal and had it dissallowed this board would have been in meltdown, we got away with one, lets move on to the next game.


Bull Shit. Proper call. Don't post if you are this ignorant about the rules.
When I need your permission to speak I will ask for it you prick
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.