Shaelumstash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Apr 2009
- Messages
- 8,254
The bizarre thing about all this is how easily it could be fixed if City or Nike listened to opinion.
The shirt seems to have split us. Many people don't like it but a lot, myself included, quite like it. It's certainly not what I'd choose but having seen the football headlines picture, I think it's smart.
The thing that almost everyone agrees on is the shorts and socks. Give that shirt white shorts and sky blue socks with navy turnovers to match the sleeves or navy socks with sky blue turnovers and it'd be really good.
Nike seem to value their template over all of this though and as a result, have turned the fans against their products. It really wouldn't be difficult even at this stage to give us different shorts and socks.
They did it last season with the ghost green kit which was launched with black socks Tha the team never actually wore. They could rectify this kit and still stick to their template shirt and far more people would be happy.
I agree with this mate.
City don't wear navy blue sleeves, it's not a City thing. But England don't wear blue sleeves either. As a one off if Nike want every single team in the world to have different coloured sleeves, for whatever reason, I can live with it as a one off.
As you say, if the shirt was teamed with white shorts and blue socks it would be fine.
But giving us a weird shirt, and then giving us shorts that aren't City and then giving us socks that aren't City is just too much in one go. It's a triple whammy of things that aren't part of our identity.
We really need to have this Cityzens home kit consultation now, this shouldn't be allowed to happen again.