Tim of the Oak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2012
- Messages
- 18,993
KnaresboroughBlue said:Tim of the Oak said:KnaresboroughBlue said:I have no idea who they even are but I think they just commented on the story, it wasn't their research It says the research was carried out by the Institute of Fiscal Studies (who I equally know nothing about).
There seems to be a big gap in the article / "research" about pension contributions - unless I have missed the obvious?
No idea what you mean there. Just copied it from <a class="postlink" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/pensions/11152840/Public-vs-private-sector-pay-gap-is-5000-or-a-fifth-of-earnings.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/pers ... nings.html</a>
Thanks Knaresborough Blue
The article doesn't mention what percentage or amount of their salaries public and private workers are investing to get their respective pensions.
Yes pensions in the NHS are good (and typically better than the private sector) but without the pension contribution information, the earnings figures quoted could be misleading.