Nick Griffin & the BNP

[Ticket For Schalke]

I often wonder if Griffin could see into the future, and been as radical as he was in the days. i think most people accept some of his lesser radical views areok.

 

[tueartsboots]

The government could have them dubbed like Thatcher did with the IRA.
Worked really well [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6UhXivPyw4[/youtube]

 

[tommyducks]

If they say anything that incites racism, they will have committed a crime.

So let them speak, then arrest them.

 

[stony]

The BNP will take a lot of tory votes.

On that basis only I am glad they are standing.

I think you're wrong there mate. Any progress the BNP has made is in traditional Labour strongholds. Areas of high unemployment where it's easy to radicalise the poorly educated and give them something or someone tangible to blame.

 

[Ticket For Schalke]

The BNP will take a lot of tory votes.

On that basis only I am glad they are standing.

I think you're wrong there mate. Any progress the BNP has made is in traditional Labour strongholds. Areas of high unemployment where it's easy to radicalise the poorly educated and give them something or someone tangible to blame.

correcttake for example, burnley, stoke etc.

 

[MCFC BOB]

I don't agree with he BNP's values and I think Nick Griffin is scum, but they should be allowed to stand because (like someone said) they are a legitamate party, and therefore should be allowed to stand.

 

[TheMightyQuinn]

The BNP will take a lot of tory votes.

On that basis only I am glad they are standing.

I think you're wrong there mate. Any progress the BNP has made is in traditional Labour strongholds. Areas of high unemployment where it's easy to radicalise the poorly educated and give them something or someone tangible to blame.

I see what you're saying and you're right but I still can't help but think that in some instances the BNP will distract a few tory voters. I could be wrong though.

I'm still praying for nuclear holocaust though. Every fucking day.

 

[denislawsbackheel]

As far as I am aware the BNP are NOT a legitimate party.
They were deemed to be illegal when their constitution was seen to be exclusive. They were told they had to change. This they did but the new constitution was deemed unlawful too due to it allowing for possible intimidation. As far as I know they have not yet complied with the last high court ruling to change their constitution to an acceptable form.<br /><br />-- Wed Apr 07, 2010 6:56 pm --<br /><br />

The BNP will take a lot of tory votes.

On that basis only I am glad they are standing.

I think you're wrong there mate. Any progress the BNP has made is in traditional Labour strongholds. Areas of high unemployment where it's easy to radicalise the poorly educated and give them something or someone tangible to blame.

The BNP have no need of radicalising the Tory heartland though do they?

 

[tueartsboots]

I think you're wrong there mate. Any progress the BNP has made is in traditional Labour strongholds. Areas of high unemployment where it's easy to radicalise the poorly educated and give them something or someone tangible to blame.

I see what you're saying and you're right but I still can't help but think that in some instances the BNP will distract a few tory voters. I could be wrong though.

I'm still praying for nuclear holocaust though. Every fucking day.

The thing is most Tory strongholds have few ethnics in those wards, I mean would you want to live next door to one?

 

[denislawsbackheel]

Next to a Tory?
Ooh the thought makes me shudder!