Her cost for a partnership with Labour is adding 20% to NHS funding, on top of what Labour are offering.
Fucking marvellous economics.
Total charlatan.
I don't get what you are unhappy about. Recently you were complaining that she was a single issue politician with just the referendum to pursue.
She has diversified, when 'naming her price' for a coalition, scrapping trident, increased spending on NHS, ending cuts, zero tolerance of prejudice (antisemitism racism etc). She is really targeting the Scottish audience abd voters by nameing all the things they care for, in her 'price' offer.
Now i obviously acknowledge that they are all hollow soundbites, that she'll never really have to back up, as a) no way is the labour party going to win enough to even have a chance at going into a coalition/minority gov with her support (imho), and b) even if they did, wouldn't go into one. So it really is a capaigning strategy, nothing else. I mean, she can't exactly stand on a 'if i become PM' pledge like Swinson, Boris & Corbyn.
I actually think she’s an effective politician. She’s got a knack of having a terrible plan and lying about it whilst convincing millions of people both north and south of the border that she’s honest and has a good plan. That’s a skill few people have.
They’re a party with one single end goal and that’s Scottish independence. Obviously when they are in government, which they technically are now, they’ll have to have domestic policies to run the country but the fact remains that they are a single issue party and a populist one at that - notice how she’s all about sound bites and the independence policy itself lacks a frightening amount of detail.
Now on your second point, there is a chance that Labour could go into a coalition with her, in the event of a hung parliament. This is her price for doing so and considering the IFS have said Labour’s manifesto isn’t doable, whacking another 20% onto the NHS spending isn’t good economics, in fact it’s more ludicrous than McDonnell’s policy as Chancellor and the bloke’s a Marxist.
I’ve come to the conclusion that you’ll defend her no matter what. You’ll obviously refute that by saying I’ll attack her know matter what, but the point still remains that you will.
I actually think she’s an effective politician. She’s got a knack of having a terrible plan and lying about it whilst convincing millions of people both north and south of the border that she’s honest and has a good plan. That’s a skill few people have.
Just on that bit she isn’t in opposition convincing people she has a good plan. She’s governed now for 5 years ( the SNP for 12 years),and will likely stay in power at the next Holyrood election in a system designed to prevent one party winning majorities ( though at the time that was because they thought Labour would dominate). So either Scots are very gullible or actually they are fairly happy with how her and the SNP plan is working for Scotland.
4th para, agree she's a good politician, but with none of the rest.
If anyone thinks Corbyn had a car-crash interview with Andrew Neill (which he did) then the interview with Sturgeon is another level.
It's not great if you like political theory and soundbites but if you like to see a single politician/party's main argument being systematically and logically taken apart then watch it.
Corbyn is getting my vote this time around because I want to vote for something different.