ono
Well-Known Member
Erm no, but then again i didn't suggest that we do that.sqblue said:ono said:He's a good anchorman, but that's about it. I think we're a better side without him.
good point. what we need to do is buy all the best attacking players in the world like madrid do/ did. that surely can't fail, can it?
fact is, ndj will be part of a squad which can be tailored to play the opposition like all the top teams. last night for example, we could have probably got away with no defensive minded midfielders, and blown wigan away. that same team up against manyoo or chelsea would get murdered though.
I just think we benefit more as a team from utilising players who can keep the ball and support each other.
De Jong's job is chase people away from his area of the pitch. Unfortunately this leaves us a midfielder short, and because of this we hand the initiative to the oppositions midfield.
It leaves us with one central midfielder to chase 2 or 3 of the oppositions, and when that player is as slow as Barry or Vieira, it actually creates an even bigger problem. The oppositions midfield advance past our single central midfielder and suddenly De Jong has a big problem on his hands, and as others have noticed, he ends up chasing shadows.
He would be great as an anchorman in a diamond, with two competant ball players in front of him. At the minute though, playing him in certain games is causing us a big problem.