Nine years and four months for 3 lives

If they were determined not to wear seat belts, I'm not sure the warning alarm would convince them to.

I wear a seat belt all the time, if only to shut the bloody annoying "beep beep beep" up!
But the alarms are so bloody annoying that disabling them makes sense if you don't wear them.
 
I don't understand why anyone wouldn't wear a seatbelt. Are people that determined to be "cool".
A guy I knew in school wouldn't wear a helmet on his motorbike because he said it was "gay", you can probably guess how that ended up
 
I don't understand why anyone wouldn't wear a seatbelt. Are people that determined to be "cool".
A guy I knew in school wouldn't wear a helmet on his motorbike because he said it was "gay", you can probably guess how that ended up
Did he move to Brighton & live with a bloke called Nigel & a poodle called Fifi?
(if you have been affected in any way by this offensive post please dont bother telling me)
 
Technically, it's nine years per victim, but the sentences are to run concurrently. So, yeah; in effect, what you said. Why they couldn't be consecutive sentences, which would be a more suitable sentence, is a mystery to me.

In this scenario I'm not sure 27 years behind bars does any good for society either. Just end up with a 46 year old who can offer society nothing.

Hard picking what the appropriate punishment/rehabilitation should be though.

Banned from driving for life, education courses on the impact of his actions whilst behind bars and then there should be a minimum number of hours community service every week for the rest of his life. I think all would be appropriate.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.