No action against Lukaku

So can you explain why our very own Shaun Goater also stated it didn`t warrant a sending off and he himself had also shown petulance by kicking out in frustration ?

It’s the Petulance thing that’s the red herring, Sir David of Becks got a red for kicking out, the Lump quite clearly did it twice and should have gone, he didn’t so should have got retrospective punishment, petulance isn’t mentioned anywhere in the rules it just bollocks although Bong almost had bruised ones
 
The rags have scored 28 goals in the Premier League this season. 3 against teams currently in the top half of the table and 16 against teams in the botton 5. (20 against teams in the bottom 7).
 
The decision not to ban Lookatme is obviously a ploy to keep the title race interesting , if the F.A.had done their job and banned the useless c*nt for three games he would have missed Watford,Goons and us , but the F.A. have actually done the title race a dis-service , because Lookatme is garbage , a flat track bully who goes missing in big games (any team in the top ten). The fact the Rags proclaimed him the next DenisLaw/AndyCole/DwightYorke(delete as applicable) after four games against relegation fodder is the really hilarious part , £89m for an immobile lump with an ego nearly as big as his ridiculous wage packet , i was going to back Belgium as an outsider for the World Cup , but with this useless f*cker in their team , they won't get out of the group stages , he makes Shaun Goater look like Pele.
Goater look like Pele, lmao.
 
Gallagher has a point when he says it was more petulant then violent/brutality. Sean Goater agreed with him too.

Having said that it could have gone the other way, certainly is debatable.
i try to give the rags a fair crack, but what your saying is nonsense
 
It’s the Petulance thing that’s the red herring, Sir David of Becks got a red for kicking out, the Lump quite clearly did it twice and should have gone, he didn’t so should have got retrospective punishment, petulance isn’t mentioned anywhere in the rules it just bollocks although Bong almost had bruised ones
I`d sooner an ex player come out and explain that he`d done it on more than one occasion.Just because the word petulance doesn`t appear in the manual means that it could be a couple of words that refs are not supposed to use ... common sense.
I`m not supporting anyone ... apart from The Goat and if he says that its not a sending off,then that`ll do for me.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.