No action against Lukaku

Would a FOI request work to find out who was on the label and how they reached the decision? Yet another example of how corrupt the game is and how people benefit from giving the right decisions. One day it will all come out in the wash
 
Psychedelic Casual said:
Who cares?

If we lift the trophy I don’t give a shit who says or writes what about us or them. I don’t anyway to be honest.

The press, radio and Tv stations, ex players, pundits, managers, fanboys... none of them matter in the grand scheme of things.

Those who have any ounce of anything about them knows what’s what with us and them and that’s all that matters
Click to expand...

Not in this case, these are the fuckers that usually lead the witch hunt. So they can matter in the grand scheme of things.
 
Falcao said:
What's to say? I'm not defending Lukaku, he was stupid and I said yesterday that I wouldn't argue if he was banned.

However I think Gallagher breaks it down well and Goater also said that when you feel mishandled on set pieces from markers the inclination is to get them off you. I also think the non-reaction of Bong or any other Brighton player is telling in this case.
Click to expand...

Yes. What it tells you is, that they are more fucking professional than Lukaku can ever wish to be.
 
Eds said:
Would a FOI request work to find out who was on the label and how they reached the decision? Yet another example of how corrupt the game is and how people benefit from giving the right decisions. One day it will all come out in the wash
Click to expand...

No.
I don't want the panellists revealed due to the neanderthal balaclava mob who follow football.
Reaching a decision falls down to opinion, and clearly at least one does not view it as a red card offence. That's fine, as the alternative is not really having a panel at all.
 
oakiecokie said:
He doesn`t know the law means he knows nothing of the subject matter,stop trying to wriggle out of it.
Click to expand...

Wtf... he's wrong in this instance simple. As the vast majority of people on this thread agree with. Go look at the law and let me know where it states petulance is ok... And even if Shaun had kicked out and got away with it in the past, this doesn't mean it's all ok....
 
Bluearmy said:
Wtf... he's wrong in this instance simple. As the vast majority of people on this thread agree with. Go look at the law and let me know where it states petulance is ok... And even if Shaun had kicked out and got away with it in the past, this doesn't mean it's all ok....
Click to expand...
Ah the vast majority of Blues fans who hate who ? Shaun never said it was OK either.As he stated it was frustration.
 
Not surprised really.
The granny shagger didnt even get done for running half way across the pitch the elbow a wigan player
 
Since when did Shaun Goater become the authority on what should or should not be a red card?
How anybody can watch that clip and not reach the conclusion that it’s a banning offence is mental.
Love the Goat but nah, he’s wrong on this.
 
bondsman said:
Who were the 3 man panel? That should be made public because that decision is a disgrace and actions like lukaku’s have no place in the game. If a panel isn’t going to challenge that but will challenge a dive then it’s a fucking jokeshop
Click to expand...
The problem is that it only takes one of the twats to disagree about retrospective action and nothing is done.

As for the "petulance" nonsense that's being bandied around, if that view holds then SWP should be getting compo for his retrospective 3-match ban after flicking his foot at Rory Delap at Stoke after Delap had fouled him and then blasted the ball at him from point blank range. Kicking out at an opponent like that is a red card offence all fucking day long.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top