tolmie's hairdoo said:goose72 said:Ooh - angry AND humourless - nice combination...
Suppose it's a step up from ignorant AND deluded
Maybe if your hopes of a resounding North Korean win in any battle, wasn't based on an address assessment to US Congress made nine years ago, they would be in with a chance.
Think you'll find subsequent years of sanctions has left this tin-pot regime pretending at best, they have a nuclear threat, blowing up tons of TNT deep inside mountains to gauge an international response.
But hey ho, you would rather your deluded dreams would be able to play itself out, notwithstanding the millions of innocent North Koreans who would die in the blast process.
I'll let your bullshit Utopia have the last word, as per usual.
Oh dear - you are aware I haven't made any allusions to any assesments of a North Korean victory, so it would appear you may have wanted to be humourless and angry to someone else?
I did wonder what all your nonsense about numbers and Goosestepping had to do with what I'd said, but didn't like to interrupt a lunatic mid-rant. That said - I was intrigued by your assessment that numbers count for nothing or I'd be goosestepping. I was led to believe that the large numbers of troops in the Red Army proved quite an advantage in WWII.
I'm sure you'll prove me wrong, or just answer a totally different question in a slightly annoyed manner...