In fairness, a much better way to disguise equity investment, than paying Mancini twice or setting up dodgy multimillion petrodollar telecoms companies and airlines.
Good idea. We could do a Scouse job and offset it against ffp. Be sure to use a fag packet though!If they want to give me a couple of million to design a new one, I am up for it :)
So dicks abound, surely this isn't news?
@jrb With the points about the rest of the site, I was looking through the photos and the club has not hidden the plans for the rest of the site
Please look at this official photo from the club, the outlays of the building are there
View attachment 104456
Just look in the background behind the hotel you see the outline of buidings
View attachment 104458
Here is photo that appeared online just after the plans where annoaced by the club
View attachment 104461
Here are plans for the rest of the site that was on the planning statement, I can put money on number 2 being a multistorey car park for the hotel and COOP live, similar to the one being built at Poland Street. I do not have a clue what 3 or 4 are. Looks like there are plans for opposite the coop area as well @bluesmith you heard anything
Possibly? But as we all know City don’t make anything public until they are ready, which could be years. The CFA and NS expansion are two examples of that. The companies and people who work on the proposals do not say anything either. Just like the CFA and the NS expansion, we’re going to have to be very patient before we get to see the proposal for the Collar site made public.
Sorry mate, no explanation for my random post. I am also half-a-century-up (plus a little more) and prone to the odd memory lapse these days. That said, I was driving to work when this was posted so very strange….... iss off? :)
As you say, it was strange to include it in the NS planning application. Saying that, the descriptions of the buildings which would have been included with the numbers have been removed.Plus who knows how much they might change in the meantime too.
Someone dropped the ball a bit, leaving that image in thought.aybe Particularly as it looks like it has been removed from the page before, and is from another bit that is hardly related.
As you say, it was strange to include it in the NS planning application. Saying that, the descriptions of the buildings which would have been included with the numbers have been removed.
View attachment 104523
Pure guess work. No 3’s shape looks like an indoor (sports) arena, a convention centre, or a leisure destination of sorts. As for 4, nothing springs to mind going off the shape.
Love to know how that works. Our owner buys something from himself…. What’s the point in that? Does he buy the seats and then pay someone to sit in them? Thick as fuck some people.
It’s a long running joke mate that the only way we could sell out having “no fans” is for our owner to secretly buy the seats himself and pass them on.Love to know how that works. Our owner buys something from himself…. What’s the point in that? Does he buy the seats and then pay someone to sit in them? Thick as fuck some people.