In fairness, a much better way to disguise equity investment, than paying Mancini twice or setting up dodgy multimillion petrodollar telecoms companies and airlines.
North Stand Construction Discussion
- Thread starter awest
- Start date
In fairness, a much better way to disguise equity investment, than paying Mancini twice or setting up dodgy multimillion petrodollar telecoms companies and airlines.
Dannyblue52
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Oct 2017
- Messages
- 189
Good idea. We could do a Scouse job and offset it against ffp. Be sure to use a fag packet though!
Centurions
Well-Known Member
So dicks abound, surely this isn't news?
nmc
Well-Known Member
Love to know how that works. Our owner buys something from himself…. What’s the point in that? Does he buy the seats and then pay someone to sit in them? Thick as fuck some people.
Possibly? But as we all know City don’t make anything public until they are ready, which could be years. The CFA and NS expansion are two examples of that. The companies and people who work on the proposals don’t say anything either. Just like the CFA and the NS expansion we’re going to have to be very patient before we get to see the proposal for the Collar site made public.
Last edited:
Sorry mate, no explanation for my random post. I am also half-a-century-up (plus a little more) and prone to the odd memory lapse these days. That said, I was driving to work when this was posted so very strange…
As you say, it was strange to include it in the NS planning application. Saying that, the descriptions of the buildings which would have been included with the numbers have been removed.
Pure guess work. No 3’s shape looks like an indoor (sports) arena, a convention centre, or a leisure destination of sorts. As for 4, nothing springs to mind going off the shape.
Last edited:
supercity88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2009
- Messages
- 14,066