nmc
Well-Known Member
I would hate to be the guy disconnecting and reconnecting those 7 catenary tension cables to the new anchor.
With a pair of pliers and a strong grip….
I would hate to be the guy disconnecting and reconnecting those 7 catenary tension cables to the new anchor.
Exactly what I was wondering about. Transferring that tension whilst the cables are under load is a very impressive engineering solution.
It will be like 9/11 when half theI would hate to be the guy disconnecting and reconnecting those 7 catenary tension cables to the new anchor.
It should be for our hardcore only, no SK postcode, no ticketIf they get this right (which they won't) they should make this new end the cheapest part of the stadium but make it accesible to long serving and vocal fans. They could even sell the season tickets on a points basis. They could address so many issues at once. Atmosphere and ticket price unrest. The two are almost hand-in-hand because it's the working class fans who make the noise and who are the most disillusioned. Also the PR would be superb: club of the people and all that.
What an opportunity they have. They blew it once with the south stand extension and I bet they blow this one again.
I would hate to be the guy disconnecting and reconnecting those 7 catenary tension cables to the new anchor.
Interesting observation. What are your thoughts on the quadpods?
Well done @supercity88 and @Coatigan for their informal way of informing us what is happening with the roof, very helpful work they guys, keep up the good work.
@jrb is allowed to have his opinion on what is thinks is right, he not having a go at anyone on here. If he thinks the club are doing wrong he is allowed to say it.
Just like I don't like the fins on the hotel or the roof on the fan zone, I am allowed to post about it. It's not up to certain individuals to tell us to go elsewhere
Like a majority of City fans, we were sold on the idea of City having a home end like The Kop or Yellow Wall and that is what a vast majority of city fans want... At no time with the club questionnaire were we told that they were going to shove a GA+ section in the middle of it.
So until the club says that they not doing this @jrb and the 1894 are within their rights to have a go at the club
Well done @supercity88 and @Coatigan for their informal way of informing us what is happening with the roof, very helpful work they guys, keep up the good work.
@jrb is allowed to have his opinion on what is thinks is right, he not having a go at anyone on here. If he thinks the club are doing wrong he is allowed to say it.
Just like I don't like the fins on the hotel or the roof on the fan zone, I am allowed to post about it. It's not up to certain individuals to tell us to go elsewhere
Like a majority of City fans, we were sold on the idea of City having a home end like The Kop or Yellow Wall and that is what a vast majority of city fans want... At no time with the club questionnaire were we told that they were going to shove a GA+ section in the middle of it.
So until the club says that they not doing this @jrb and the 1894 are within their rights to have a go at the club
Not yet.Are you in a wheelchair?
Actually, I was telling @Coatigan before he came round to it yesterday ;)
The best conclusions are the ones you take some time to get to!
Please push that we want it as OUR HOME END, going forward this has to be it, not our most vocal fans moved in cup games. Thanks AlexCity Matters and the 1894 Group have the next meeting with the club on the North Stand a week on Monday.
It’s my understanding that the club will be bringing some more concrete plans on things like seating and hospitality.
Based on the research I have seen (both produced by the club and elsewhere) and my own opinion, I’m quite clear that I want the North Stand to be a vocal, atmospheric end, complete with additional new season tickets. That said, if people do have strong opinions that it should be something else, then I will get that across.
Happy for people to leave comments here, or equally send me an email at: alex.howell@citymatters.co.uk
City Matters and the 1894 Group have the next meeting with the club on the North Stand a week on Monday.
It’s my understanding that the club will be bringing some more concrete plans on things like seating and hospitality.
Based on the research I have seen (both produced by the club and elsewhere) and my own opinion, I’m quite clear that I want the North Stand to be a vocal, atmospheric end, complete with additional new season tickets. That said, if people do have strong opinions that it should be something else, then I will get that across.
Happy for people to leave comments here, or equally send me an email at: alex.howell@citymatters.co.uk
If Alex asked all those questions he'd be even more unpopular with the club hierarchy then he probably is now.PS.
Can you ask the club for an update on the proposed 700 GA+ seats at the front of NSL2. Are they staying or are they going?
Are there any plans for safe standing seats on NSL2 or NSL1 regardless of the quantity and location on either tier?
Are there any plans for a singing section on NSL2?
Will standing be allowed on NSL2 or will sitting be strictly enforced by the club and stewards? Which could cause problems with fans determined to stand.
Are there any plans for cheap season tickets and match day tickets on NSL2.
Will there be a block put aside for the vocal younger fans with affordable season tickets and match day tickets?
Will fan flags and banners be allowed on NSL2?
Does the club see the North stand and NSL2 as a proper home end? If so, how are they going to create that? If not, what do they see it as? Is it atmosphere over match day revenue, or revenue over match day atmosphere, or is there room for both?
Thanks again.
If Alex asked all those questions he'd be even more unpopular with the club hierarchy then he probably is now.
They'll be far happier when they ask Angela Worrall if she has any points to raise and she answers that she hasn't.