Your words, not mine, re the 1894. But I do stand by what I said about their statement.
That post above, and their response are very different, let's not pretend to be dumb.
Look, I might be a bit of a git here and there, but I am not usually unreasonable. The fact I reacted to it like that, and the fact that a dozen or so generally level-headed blues agreed with me, I would say suggests their statement is actually open to being read like that, and rubbing people the wrong way.
It is easy to bang out cliches of 'standing up against a corporate machine' while avoiding the actual response.
I read it again today having slept on it. I see it the same way as I did yesterday, indulgently championing their conflict with the club, first and forememost.