richards30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2009
- Messages
- 31,725
MEGA!
Which part or document is that from, all the plans I've been looking at just has it down as hospitality or 'premium spaces' and similar to 'Joe's Bar'. That said they state a 600 capacity but the recent release has it down as just 300. I wonder whether there's some typo's in that release or have they upgraded the seats it's related to?Well, we've all been taken by surprise, but the details have been hiding in plain sight in the planning docs (even includes the name Cross Bar ffs!) I have drawn how City hall will be accessed from inside the stadium. It seems us plebs in level 0 will have to stick to the concourse.View attachment 173052
Make (the) Etihad Great Again?MEGA!
I did tell you this a few months back...
Should all be done for the start of season, assuming we ask for an away game to start.
In your opinion...
MEGA!
There’s nothing to disagree with - It’s a factual statement. The full extended tier isn’t really being used in a way that has any additional benefit over a third tier.
The current planned set up of tier 2 means that for all intents and purposes, the expansion itself is operating as a 3rd tier.
Tier 2 would have the family stand in place, then a dividing line for GA+ seats, and then standard/safe standing seats.
That means there’s no real difference, apart from visually, then if they had built a third tier instead, kept the family stand as tier 2 and had tier 3 as standard and safe standing.
Went on the planning portal map on manchester.gov.ukWhich part or document is that from, all the plans I've been looking at just has it down as hospitality or 'premium spaces' and similar to 'Joe's Bar'. That said they state a 600 capacity but the recent release has it down as just 300. I wonder whether there's some typo's in that release or have they upgraded the seats it's related to?
That seems to be the position many are taking.
They're letting 800 (TBC) GA+ seats within a stand that will add another 6,000+ to the existing North Stand Level 1 prevent them from getting behind the positives.
Let's step back and imagine we're moving into the stadium for the first time. The South Stand has the away fans - great for some banter. But it's split over three levels and very hard to generate a coordinated atmosphere.
The North Stand has some GA+ seating within it, and not in ideal locations. But it's one huge tier providing an opportunity for 6,000+ blues to go and make a racket under the roof. The design from a noise perspective is by far the best - with the side panels and slope. It's going to make a racket. Initially 3,000 of those blues will have safe standing, with the ability to expand that provision.
Definitely, its up to the fans to get in there and sing! This is the last chance but for whatever reason some fans are finding excuse after excuse...fucking bizzare !It's not a factual statement at all! You're suggesting our 2 tier stand is 3 tiers. It isn't.
Whether it's got families at the front and some GA+ in it doesn't stop it being a single tier. They're not segregated by a physical split in the stand. Your perception is that we'll have a group of families sat on their bums with a group of GA+ fans sat on their bums and that wrecks what could have been. I don't think that is enough to write off the whole stand as being capable of generating a good atmosphere. How many of us went to Maine Road as kids and joined in the singing? And then got older and looked to go in the noisiest parts of the ground?
It would of course be better to be a fully safe standing tier, but I genuinely don't believe we have enough fans who would want to fill that and make a noise anyway based on what I've witnessed at Wembley in recent cup finals.
When there's a good set of away fans at the Etihad you can hear them. We've got double that number in the North Stand, half of them currently proposed as safe standing. That's enough to make some noise.
It's not a factual statement at all! You're suggesting our 2 tier stand is 3 tiers. It isn't.
Whether it's got families at the front and some GA+ in it doesn't stop it being a single tier. They're not segregated by a physical split in the stand. Your perception is that we'll have a group of families sat on their bums with a group of GA+ fans sat on their bums and that wrecks what could have been. I don't think that is enough to write off the whole stand as being capable of generating a good atmosphere. How many of us went to Maine Road as kids and joined in the singing? And then got older and looked to go in the noisiest parts of the ground?
It would of course be better to be a fully safe standing tier, but I genuinely don't believe we have enough fans who would want to fill that and make a noise anyway based on what I've witnessed at Wembley in recent cup finals.
When there's a good set of away fans at the Etihad you can hear them. We've got double that number in the North Stand, half of them currently proposed as safe standing. That's enough to make some noise.
Once the stand, the hotel, the claws, the fan zone, the paving, the roads, the landscaping, the planting, the street furniture is all done, it will look brilliant, especially during the Summer months with the better weather.
Then on to the Collar site, hopefully? That’s for another thread.
Joe Mercer Way is about 200 meters and if they were doing it all you’d think it would be included in these pictures. It’s not like a side job. It’s a good stretch of tarmac’ing.
I’m sure they will be doing it as it would be a weird eye sore next to new landscaping at the top and around the hotel etc if they didn’t.
The club need to promote the hell out of this as an atmosphere end, give 1894 their own area at the back, then offer season in the existing singing areas first refusal to relocate, in groups if they want, and also offer a big discount for the first year. The first season is make or break. If the existing singers don’t move it will fail. If they do I think it will be a bigger success than anyone can even dream of.
The ground needs one voice.
Just means regular seats, whether season ticket or matchday, not dedicated bar or padded seat.So GA + is a padded seat with access to a bar food area instead of the concourse like 93:20 or Joes, they will still be season ticket holders with the odd match day seats.Please excuse my ignorance/density of brain but I take it GA stands for General Admission as in buying the tickets weekly/matchly? :-)
Which is exactly why 1894 need to engage and be involved with the club discussing those 3000 standing/ singing seats.I totally agree with you Dave.
What update announcement did we get from the club yesterday.
The Cross Bar, welcoming 300 fans and offering a relaxed, social atmosphere.
A 500 fan City Hall enhanced bar experience.
Absolutely no mention of a dedicated singing section with in, and as part of the 3000 safe standing seats mentioned, which we all knew about.
Maybe the club think the 3000 safe standing seats, along with the 3000 City fans stood in front of those safe standing seats will create an atmosphere without a dedicated singing section, block or blocks?
Once those 3000 safe standing seats are filled with general City fans, Mem Women, Youth, singers, non singers, football tourists, hotel guests, etc, nothing can and will be changed if the the NSL2 tier isn't improving the atmosphere inside the ground.