Now..... About the Mancini Out Threads.

[gelly]

Lets stop making these Mancini out and Jose rumour threads, it's destablising this players, manager and club. I reckon they need to be locked by Mods.

Mancini just won at Stamford Bridge who have been on an unbeaten streak since losing to Liverpool in November 2008. He's proven himself. Let Mancini work in peace at least until the end of the season.

 

[mackenzie]

And THIS Moomba is what started it.

You mentioned Hughes, nobody else.

It was a genuine question as to whether those not happy with Mancini today felt that way for footballing or other reasons.

If you took it the wrong way, you're problem.

And if you think I was the first to mention Hughes today, maybe try some reading glasses.

Why mention him at all?

And it wasn't a genuine question at all, it was a dig. And you know it.

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

Can we not get back to supporting Mancini??

We support Manchester City (or at least we should).

I supported them under Mercer, Allison, Bond, Saunders, Book, McNeill, Frizzell, Clark, Ball, Royle, Keegan, Pearce, Eriksson, Hughes & Mancini. Didn't like some of those managers but I still supported the club. But that won't ever stop me making criticisms or giving praise where warranted.

And while I thoroughly enjoyed today's performance, I'm concerned that when we could have scored 2 or 3 more, we let nine men run the game. It's over, we have the 3 points and a historic double but the next one is more important now.

 

[mackenzie]

I'm taking bets on the next poster to say the word "Hughes" in a Mancini thread.

1/5 scorer or moomba.

100/1 me

;-)

 

[scorer]

I'm taking bets on the next poster to say the word "Hughes" in a Mancini thread.

1/5 scorer or moomba.

100/1 me

;-)

That Bowen and his gaffer were a right pair of....

 

[moomba]

Why mention him at all?

And it wasn't a genuine question at all, it was a dig. And you know it.

Until such a time as you decide what other people can post or not post, you're just going to have to deal with posts that you don't agree with.

FWIW, it was a genuine question, based on a theory I (and I'm sure a few others) have.

 

[mackenzie]

Why mention him at all?

And it wasn't a genuine question at all, it was a dig. And you know it.

Until such a time as you decide what other people can post or not post, you're just going to have to deal with posts that you don't agree with.

FWIW, it was a genuine question, based on a theory I (and I'm sure a few others) have.

I can deal with posts I don't agree with moomba.

I'm doing it now.

And seeing as you introduced Hughes to this thread I will say one more thing.

Pearce (who you defended to the hilt for months and months) wouldn't have had half the success at Blackburn that Hughes did.

So stick that where the sun doesn't shine.

x

 

[mackenzie]

I'm taking bets on the next poster to say the word "Hughes" in a Mancini thread.

1/5 scorer or moomba.

100/1 me

;-)

That Bowen and his gaffer were a right pair of....

Feckin LIBERRTTYYY!!!

 

[Anonymous]

Can we all just agree that Mark Hughes was a clueless twat and Mancini will lead us to success.

An opinion formed by Immaculate Pasta even during our defeats to rags, Hull and Everton.

Then we kiss and make up and sing city songs for ever and ever. Amen.

 

[mackenzie]

Can we all just agree that Mark Hughes was a clueless twat and Mancini will lead us to success.

An opinion formed by Immaculate Pasta even during our defeats to rags, Hull and Everton.

Then we kiss and make up and sing city songs for ever and ever. Amen.

GGGrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

What makes you think Hughes is clueless.

Are you beating away Premiership Chairmen from your door or something?