jimharri said:I suggest you check who started this thread. Some people on here can't seerm to resist having pops at Hughes, over 2 months since he left.moomba said:If we hadn't had week after week of "I wish we still had Hughes" and "Mancini is rubbish" threads whenever we drop points from people that defended Hughes for 18 months of underperformance I suspect his name wouldn't come up so much when we win.
We should get over the Hughes era, but not only when it suits.
So what if people can't resist taint pops at the clueless twat. People couldn't resist taking pops at Sven a good 18 months after he left the job, and he did an infinitely better job than Hughes. People can't resist taking a pop at Pearce four years down the line. People have been having a pop at Swales and the poor Tucker is long gone from this world.
If you don't like it, put up a counter argument, because while people persist in going on about how much better Hughes would have done and how much of a mistake it was tosack him, others will continue to point out just how wrong they were