Messi, Ramos, Donnarumma, Wijnaldum, Pereira, Hakimi and Mendes. All for less than we spent on Grealish.
Be a tough window to top (on paper at least, lets see if it pans out).
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Nuno Mendes
- Thread starter BlueDejong
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Be a tough window to top (on paper at least, lets see if it pans out).
Irrelevant when we had £50m in sales + Agueros contract off the books. Very easy to swap Grealish out for Aguero. Grealish costs us around £30-35m a year in wages + amortization. Agueros wages alone used to cost us around £20m a year. So “breaking” a transfer record in Grealish has hardly changed anything for usWe’ve just spunked a £100 million on the nose for Jack, not pay in five years, we have the money and in the main spend it well.
itisrising
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Sep 2011
- Messages
- 4,331
We only have 1 LB and even he isn't a natutal LB. PSG signing Mendes on an option to buy is ludicrously good business, there's no way getting around that. This obsession that the board always know best after this disaster of a window full of mishaps should be firmly put to bed.Yeah, but the folk on here know more than Pep. The shit bald fraud. So let's sign him anyway. Despite there being no evidence that he can fit with what we need our fullbacks to do.
If they don’t win the Cl god poch is so done lolMessi, Ramos, Donnarumma, Wijnaldum, Pereira, Hakimi and Mendes. All for less than we spent on Grealish.
Be a tough window to top (on paper at least, lets see if it pans out).
discopop
Well-Known Member
Irrelevant when we had £50m in sales + Agueros contract off the books. Very easy to swap Grealish out for Aguero. Grealish costs us around £30-35m a year in wages + amortization. Agueros wages alone used to cost us around £20m a year. So “breaking” a transfer record in Grealish has hardly changed anything for us
I know how it works but amortisation aside we have had to transfer 100 million out from the back of the sofa to pay for the kid, we’re also in the process of contract renewals that eats well into the Sergio wages were saving, as I said we have the money just not willing to spend on players we don’t rate enough.
Sir peace frog
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 18,525
- Location
- stalking the canals and rivers
- Team supported
- Manchester City Football Club
looks fantastic, but how much are they paying for that lot in wages ? messi,ramos,donnarumma,wijnaldum and hakimi are all free transfers so will be earning top dollar, it annoys me when we get lumped in with them about ffpMessi, Ramos, Donnarumma, Wijnaldum, Pereira, Hakimi and Mendes. All for less than we spent on Grealish.
Be a tough window to top (on paper at least, lets see if it pans out).
they are forking out at least 1.5 m per week for that lot
Gaz (FMwkdsoul)
Well-Known Member
i read today PSG's front 3 make more a week than 13 Premier League squads in total.looks fantastic, but how much are they paying for that lot in wages ? messi,ramos,donnarumma,wijnaldum and hakimi are all free transfers so will be earning top dollar, it annoys me when we get lumped in with them about ffp
they are forking out at least 1.5 m per week for that lot
daztrueblue91
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 4,077
We’ve just spunked a £100 million on the nose for Jack, not pay in five years, we have the money and in the main spend it well.
I think we consistently overspend on players. Outside of the odd bargain like Jesus and Gundog, we spend elite fees on good players and good fees on average players.
discopop
Well-Known Member
PSG have absolutely destroyed us this window. Really starting to hate those french pricks
Of course they have
- Status
- Not open for further replies.