TueartsOHK
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 2,525
- Location
- Denton to West Midlands
- Team supported
- Citizens of Hope and Glory
All that is understandable, in the modern media age Oasis won't fade as they are the main part of what was the britpop genre and were put up as this shininh star of great music revival, even though if you look at the other three band, Pupo, Suede and blur were musically and lyrically much better, yet oasis are seen as the face of the early 90s music era.
Also they promoted the lad image and football culture image well to their advantage that they still get top coverage whenever they make a comments.
Doesn't mean their music is any better than aveeage though to many.
If you’re judging on musical ability there were obviously bands out there with more musical ability and I agree that Blur and Pulp amongst others had more meaningful lyrics. I’m not judging them on any of that - I’m a fan of prog rock and classic rock and Oasis won’t touch any of those bands on musicality or lyrics. But for what they did (simple pop/rock) they did it well and I don’t think they were revolutionary. Today’s teenagers don’t remember Brit pop and they weren’t exposed to the Oasis laddish image that filled the music press at the time - they simply like the songs and that’s why they play them. They don’t play Pulp, Blur or Suede