urban genie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 May 2008
- Messages
- 32,591
No, they aren't.
In my opinion they are.
No, they aren't.
Todays music is shite?
Idles
Doves
Fontains DC
Foals
Michael kiwanuka
Ren harvieu
Squid
Richard hawley
And plenty more.
Doves are vastly superior to oasis also btw even if not as famous
I bet you prefer tinned spaghetti to going out to a 5 star Italian restaurant.
In my opinion they are.
Doves is great as an instrumental in our stadium, not much more.
Oasis has a sing-along quality that makes it resonate far more widely.
Oasis songs do not stand the test if time, thats just not the case. If they did then every pub band you hear would still be playing them. Kids who are learning instruments play them because thats how basic the music is. Not having a pop, I love that Oasis are City fans and all that, but their songs are not classics. I like Noel's stuff, but again its just like
I think you’d be surprised as to how big Oasis are amongst today’s teenagers. I live in the West Midlands and as my son is a 17 year old bass player in a band I see a lot of young bands playing the pubs and clubs. The majority of cover versions by far are Oasis and Stone Roses. That’s not because the music is simple (there are more simple songs to play - which I disagree with) but because they like the songs, the swagger and the attitude. How can you say they haven’t stood the test of time if teenagers are adopting Oasis to this extent?
That’s complete bollocks to be honest. Go to a party or gathering now and regardless of age it’s the Oasis songs that get the biggest reaction towards the end of a night. Definitely Maybe is almost 30 years old and still sounds brilliant. Morning Glory (the song), Masterplan and countless others. You may not like them or say the songs aren’t difficult to play but to say they’ve not stood the test of time is a terrible argument.
As does...Doves is great as an instrumental in our stadium, not much more.
Oasis has a sing-along quality that makes it resonate far more widely.