Offside rule changed after Silva's goal against Villa

Whats the difference with what Mings Did.

And a defender playing an attacker in an off side position on side by contacting with the Ball.

The question really should be why did Mings stupidly play the Ball.
 
So fuck. The handball rule was changed after 4 games of this season, teams benefitted from this beforehand and others weren't given penalties after this for incidents much more clear cut than what penalties were awarded for earlier in the season.

We were done by a handball goal by Llorente in the CL which if it had happened a few months later would have been ruled out.

Swings and roundabouts
 
The biggest disgrace this season that nobody in the media even blinked at our mentioned was a penalty after the full time whistle was blown.

When you look at all the dodgy stuff going on the only conclusion I can come up with is it’s the scums turn to win the league!

We have to be absolutely perfect for the rest of the season and score by at least 2 to 3 goals we have to have form like we did when we got 98 points 14 wins on the bounce!
 
Why don't they just have a rule that states "If a player with a light blue shirt scores a goal for a team with a Manchester postcode do your utmost to disallow it as it is unpalatable for the American owned teams in red".
Or maybe they already have!
 
I hope Villa are the first team to have a similar goal ruled out.

Smith can get himself sent off again, Mings can once again make it abundantly clear how fucking thick he is after the game and the Villa fans will once again get themselves into a hissy fit. Top that off with them getting their squad raided in the summer and I'll be happy as Larry.

Fuck Aston Villa.
 
Correct.

That’s also why the offside law is still, even with the new guidance, weighed too much on the attackers side for me. How’s the defender there going to know if he should try and play the ball or not?

But an attacker from an off side position puts the defender under pressure to clear, but he miss ques and the attacker scores. That seems more unfair than what Rodri did. Rodri didnt put the defender under any pressure !
 
But an attack from an off side position puts the defender under pressure to clear, but he miss ques and the attacker scores. That seems more unfair than what Rodri did. Rodri didnt put the defender under any pressure !

I agree. Personally I would want those classed as offside too, never felt right to me that it falls under the interpretation of “deliberately played”. I get it if the defender has controlled the ball and then passed it, not when they are forced into an action like that though.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.