I don't see how people can think that it's fair to sack manager at this point just because there might be managers out there that might be better based on reputation. If you apply this to players we might as well sack Dunne and buy someone like Lescott who might be better. Ouh wait, we did that and jury is still out for him. There's no guarantee that the next manager would have a better record especially since Hughes' isnt that bad. He has not been great, but it's not something to give a manager a sack for. Who do you think we are? Just because we have more money than everyone else we should go sacking managers and players left and right. Hughes might show SIGNS that he isnt capable but until he proves that he isnt, until we fail our goals, im pro-hughes. I think we should stick with players and managers as long as we are sure that they wont cut it. How can someone be sure about Hughes at this point (in good or bad) is beyond me.