I would be surprised now if Pellegrini is still with us next season.
He came to us with the "nearly man" reputation - he did well with smaller clubs , he nearly won the league with RM , but really he hadn't won anything of note , and now we can see why. Yes , he won the title in his first year , but he inherited a stable , settled side , based on sound defence ( much like Wenger did at arsenal, and when he changed things in his own image , they won one FA cup in nine years- and we can't see that scenario repeated with City),and there were some very influential external influences on the outcome.
He's an old school romantic, a man who thinks trophies can still be won playing stylish , attacking football, while the pragmatists , Mourinho being the prime example, have learned how to win - at all costs , if you like (an attitude sneered at by many but undoubtedly effective) by changing and adapting styles and formations, but most of all , by playing his players in their best , most effective positions, whilst at the same time , installing a sense of self-confidence , and a will to dominate other teams because you know that you are better than they are. Yes , in two games against Chelsea we were the better side , but go and have a look at the league table!
I fear that the Turtle also has this attitude , and even Wenger to an extent seems to have made a startling change.
I support City and I support the manager, but the sheikh and his team must now surely see that we will not achieve their aims as things stand.
We need to appoint a manager of the younger , modern generation , a man who can accept when mistakes are made and make the corrections needed .