Pardew to Pellegrini

Trollsmoan said:
Shows the class of the man, heat of the moment or not. Can you seen Pellers doing something similar? nah

Think a fine is in order and a retro ban on that triple kung fu attack on Samir!

Pardew has apologised for 'the word' he used! Has he apologised for the tenor of comment? Has he apologised to the over 60s who buy STs at Newcastle?
 
Train said:
mackenzie said:
Marvin said:
Don't like taking moral standpoints very often as we all fallible, but this is the latest in a line of incidents. He should consider his position.

He seems a very bitter individual and an even worse loser. He seemed determined to make the most of that 'goal' incident and his teams kicking fouling performance in the second half smacked of his instructions.

I agree. It wasn't just one player kicking out, it was half his team. That to me says that Pardew sent them on a mission knowing that they could get away with it.
Blatantly. He knew that with the badgering of the ref at half time, they'd cowed him to the extent that there was no way he would even think of sending one of theirs off.
 
sh249 said:
Train said:
mackenzie said:
He seems a very bitter individual and an even worse loser. He seemed determined to make the most of that 'goal' incident and his teams kicking fouling performance in the second half smacked of his instructions.

I agree. It wasn't just one player kicking out, it was half his team. That to me says that Pardew sent them on a mission knowing that they could get away with it.
Blatantly. He knew that with the badgering of the ref at half time, they'd cowed him to the extent that there was no way he would even think of sending one of theirs off.

And I suspect that Cabaye wasn't enquiring as to whether the lino wanted two sugars at half time!
 
The media are just concentrating on the spat with Pellegrini, but far more serious is the OTT challenges we saw afterwards.

Is their manager responsible for that? Hard to say, but he will be very embarrassed this morning
 
Marvin said:
The media are just concentrating on the spat with Pellegrini, but far more serious is the OTT challenges we saw afterwards.

Is their manager responsible for that? Hard to say, but he will be very embarrassed this morning
I doubt it very much
 
Marvin said:
Bunk said:
BLUEMAD said:
What a strange comment. Why on earth would anyone feel bad about that result. Great 3 points.

I'm as happy as any blue with the result in and of itself, just not the nature of the result. It was a gritty performance, one to be very proud of, but there will remain a question mark over it because of the disallowed goal and how that might have effected the outcome had it been awarded. I like to win games, but I like to win them fairly.
We would have won against 9 men for sure

Granted I'd have preferred to win without controversy.

Read the guidance on what the FA regards as interference with an opponent. It makes reference to interfering with a players movement. Don't you think Hart's decision as to whether to move for the ball was influenced by Gouffran? It is debatable. I'd like to hear a referee's view. Danny Mills view is not so important
referees will be split in that one, should never have been a corner in the first place though, whoever took that shot that hart tipped over was clearly offside.
 
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader said:
carlosthejackal said:
Whatever next ? A manager swearing at his counterpart during a match !!!!!!!!!!!

Yeah, never happened in Wenger and Fergie's time!
Ferguson and Mancini a couple of seasons ago , giving it verbals big time on the touchline.
 
aguero93:20 said:
Marvin said:
Bunk said:
I'm as happy as any blue with the result in and of itself, just not the nature of the result. It was a gritty performance, one to be very proud of, but there will remain a question mark over it because of the disallowed goal and how that might have effected the outcome had it been awarded. I like to win games, but I like to win them fairly.
We would have won against 9 men for sure

Granted I'd have preferred to win without controversy.

Read the guidance on what the FA regards as interference with an opponent. It makes reference to interfering with a players movement. Don't you think Hart's decision as to whether to move for the ball was influenced by Gouffran? It is debatable. I'd like to hear a referee's view. Danny Mills view is not so important
referees will be split in that one, should never have been a corner in the first place though, whoever took that shot that hart tipped over was clearly offside.

I do remember that they had badly blown an offside that led to a corner, was it really the corner that resulted in Tiote's shot?
 
you should have bet red

you should have bet red

you lost all your money Pardew

and now your in debt
 
Trollsmoan said:
Shows the class of the man, heat of the moment or not. Can you seen Pellers doing something similar? nah

Think a fine is in order and a retro ban on that triple kung fu attack on Samir!

FA confirmed no action to be taken. They have reminded him of his responsibilities. So much for the "respect" campaign heh
 
hertsblue said:
Trollsmoan said:
Shows the class of the man, heat of the moment or not. Can you seen Pellers doing something similar? nah

Think a fine is in order and a retro ban on that triple kung fu attack on Samir!

FA confirmed no action to be taken. They have reminded him of his responsibilities. So much for the "respect" campaign heh

What a surprise
 
carlosthejackal said:
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader said:
carlosthejackal said:
Whatever next ? A manager swearing at his counterpart during a match !!!!!!!!!!!

Yeah, never happened in Wenger and Fergie's time!
Ferguson and Mancini a couple of seasons ago , giving it verbals big time on the touchline.

That was one of the funniest thing i have ever seen,football related that is,
Bobs giving it to the person every other manager was scared of
 
Very surprised the FA have a taken a lenient view on this. I expected a touchline ban at the very least. Also amazed the 4th official, i think it was Atkinson, didn't notify the Ref at the time because he must've heard it coming from the foul mouthed cockney. I guess that kind of anger between managers goes on more than we think
 
Pardew's a ****, not sure what else we can garner from this exchange, albeit that fact was out there long before yesterday. Glad there was no real controversy in the game though, nice to win without all the nonsense that normally entails..
 
Pablo1 said:
Pardew's a ****, not sure what else we can garner from this exchange, albeit that fact was out there long before yesterday. Glad there was no real controversy in the game though, nice to win without all the nonsense that normally entails..

Yeah, after all that Bodger's shite about getting a referee from Ashton Old Road to officiate The Dippers fixture, it was nice to go to St. J's and just have to put up with a bit of verbal handbags in the technical area, which kerfuffle The Time Lord Atkinson had under complete control. Pardew ought to take a lead from that well-behaved starting eleven he put out! Respect!!
 
Marvin said:
The media are just concentrating on the spat with Pellegrini, but far more serious is the OTT challenges we saw afterwards.

Is their manager responsible for that? Hard to say, but he will be very embarrassed this morning

He won't be embarrassed because he's a full blown twat - bad loser, still only in a job because he got himself a long-term contract and Newcastle didn't want to pay him off - otherwise I'm pretty sure they would have sacked him last season ....
 
stan bowles said:
Lets his emotions gets the better of him does Alan Pardew. Can't blame him today.
What the fuck? Why not, his shit team got what was coming to them. Seriously wondering about some of the "fans" today.
 
Riduculous how has pardew got away with what he said. It was clearly visibly you don't need to be a lip reader. Pardew is just a clueless knob.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top