Machiavelli
Well-Known Member
Sounds like another off topic tall story. Why would anyone's Mum give a swab to mess up the test? Yes an ex might but her Mum in on it as well? The family must really like you.
Thanks, personally id have refused to provide a sample unless i saw who was taking the other two, but thats long gone now.It wasn't done in a controlled environment. I was sent the pack and the swabs were done at home then posted to the company to perform the tests. I didn't witness her and the baby doing the swabs she wouldn't let me. Her Ex now says he was there (which I knew anyway) and she had ore collected saliva from her mum and younger brother. I said at the start the tests were of her and her mum but reading his messaged again it was her mum and her brother that did them.
I still have the written results.
No her mums her brothers and mineSo did she (child's mother) not submit her own sample?
IF, this other guy could be looking to do anything,we don't know his motives and we don't know how she will respondis it not obvious? If what he says is true and she's faked a DNA test it's pretty obvious she's not only a despicable human being but somebody that might be 'difficult'.
Can't imagine that conversation within a family!No her mums her brothers and mine
Unless the test was taken in Stoke or Norwich. The child would have 100% parental genes. The family tree, mainly trunk.I'd be dubious then. The boy's sample was replaced by the grandmother's yes?
I'm not an expert on how paternity tests are done but would like to think tests would pick up gender differences between XX grandmother and XY child? Also samples should be submitted independently in barcoded tubes?
Don't want to cause worries for you but there should be a level of fraud control in place. Another thing is that child would only have 25% grandmothers genes but 50% parents. This should show up, but as I say, I don't know how deeply paternity tests look into these things.