citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 14,061
I doubt anyone will be using thatPogood doesn’t have the same ring as Pogbad
I doubt anyone will be using thatPogood doesn’t have the same ring as Pogbad
Exactly, it doesn’t have the same ring to itI doubt anyone will be using that
A No 6 is where he'd suit us best as competition/cover for Rodri. On a free with decent wages, why wouldn't we consider it?I'd be tempted to take him on a free just for the hilarity of it all.
Would either be one of the greatest signings in Premier League history or an unmitigated disaster, no inbetween.
Maybe he fancies transitioning into a 6 now he's getting older? He has all the attributes, just a question of whether he's willing to work. If anyone could make it happen, it's Pep...
I do think his 'attitude problems' are overblown - he's an easy scapegoat for a club which is a complete mess, top to bottom.
On the other hand, he's a rag. And we don't need him.
I'm certain we'd consider it. But I'm also 99% sure we'd decide against it.A No 6 is where he'd suit us best as competition/cover for Rodri. On a free with decent wages, why wouldn't we consider it?
He was the same player at Juve as he is now, only difference is he was carried at juve, which he isn't now.Whatever. I can see something in him you can't. Think Pogba at Juve. Then think of the player we see now at Old Toilet with 3-4 managers since he joined.
I didn't realise how good he could be until Juve beat us 0-1 in the UCL & he ran the show. That player is still in there. He just needs the right environment & manager to get the most out of him.
Wages is an unknown quantity we can only speculate. "IF" he was on a wage within our structure, & considering Gundog came here as a crock, should we consider him then? Or is him being a ManUre player a bridge too far?I'm certain we'd consider it. But I'm also 99% sure we'd decide against it.
Massive wages.
he cant tell you because he isn't allowed and i'm watching to make sure he doesn'tI am not even sure what you're talking about in this post in reply to the post you quoted from me?
I replied just fine to the Pogba discussion, I have nothing against you at all but we have moved on from the Pogba discussion ( I mean, I did say we were not going to change our minds either way 3 posts back)
I asked you what the symbol meant at the end of your posts and you have gone all around the houses and refused to tell me what it means.
And again in the above post you rattle on about Pogba again when all I asked you to do was tell me what this symbol means )(
Now, why is it so hard for you to tell me what it means?
I have looked on the internet for a clue but nothing comes up for that, though oddly )() means something.
Is it a secret?
he is on a free transfer, so he will get x millions signing on fee or well over 500k a week wages to spread that signing on fee out over the contract.Wages is an unknown quantity we can only speculate. "IF" he was on a wage within our structure, & considering Gundog came here as a crock, should we consider him then? Or is him being a ManUre player a bridge too far?
The ManUre link seems to be the main deal breaker with most of our fans, which is a bit short sighted imo...