Wasn't aware anyone said that Ken hated all Jewish peopleI wouldn't mind somebody telling what was wrong with what Livingstone said because I still haven't heard it.
At WORST this is a semantic argument over what "support" means in the context of an agreement. How this means that Ken Livingstone hates all Jewish people is still a mystery to me.
Wasn't aware anyone said that Ken hated all Jewish people
Think the article referred to anti semitic incidents rather than calling Mr. Livingston anti semitic which is quite different.Calling somebody anti-Semitic is sort of doing that.
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...ruling-on-ken-livingstone-antisemitic-remarksI wouldn't mind somebody telling what was wrong with what Livingstone said because I still haven't heard it.
At WORST this is a semantic argument over what "support" means in the context of an agreement. How this means that Ken Livingstone hates all Jewish people is still a mystery to me.
Think the article referred to anti semitic incidents rather than calling Mr. Livingston anti semitic which is quite different.
No, the conclusion is that this is a racist action taken by the Labour Party and that's undeniable.
The idea that because the Labour Party isn't an institutionally racist body then it is incapable of committing racist actions is daft. It's circular logic. A dog is a dog therefore it's a dog.
I am sure they did just as people are calling Mr Corbyn a racist now I do not believe either of them are myself Ken being a victim of freedom of speech not applying to certain sections of society and Corbyn guilty of trying to be overly pc. Just adding valid information for the debate to continueJust to be clear, you think that during the outcry no organisations called Ken Livingstone an anti-Semite?
But it is deniable, do you thinking that back in the day in the States that bussing Afro-American kids in to predominantly white neighbourhoods to attend what had been white only schools was racist? for every black kid occupying a seat, there would have been a white kid sitting there and they were better schools than those in black neighbourhoods so that white kid was losing out, that must clearly be racist, the white kid is being disadvantaged on the basis of his skin colour.
It's complicated isn't it? This cack-handed move was designed. in all honesty, to increase representation from BAME.
The Daily Mail, a Tory MP and you presumably don't see Labour attempting, if rather clumsily, to broaden its representation, but instead an assault on the white working class.
You see it as you want to see it and so do I.