We'reNotReallyHere
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Jan 2014
- Messages
- 520
Personally I think Pedro is the better player.
Possibly but I would say it is fairly marginal. Pedro 18 months younger I suppose but Navas seems fairly settled, knows the way we play etc. For me this would just be introducing a new player for the sake of it, doesn't seem worth it financially or in footballing terms. We'd be better going balls out for De Bruyne IMO or even settling for what we already have.Personally I think Pedro is the better player.
As others stated, it doesn't really go with the scheme of things :/
Would surely mean nasri and Navas out
I agree, don't see the logic of this deal. De Bruyne would be perfect, our attacking options sorted.Possibly but I would say it is fairly marginal. Pedro 18 months younger I suppose but Navas seems fairly settled, knows the way we play etc. For me this would just be introducing a new player for the sake of it, doesn't seem worth it financially or in footballing terms. We'd be better going balls out for De Bruyne IMO or even settling for what we already have.
The only way I could see this happening is that Pedro is told he will play regularly. Which, if we get DeBruyne, means both of those going. The only other scenario for me is if Wolfsburg are demanding really stupid money for DeBruyne & we sack it off. But if that ws the case I think we'd know already.
I think we're just being set up for a 'snubbing'.
Agree or a I choose istory at the rags over money at City type quote.
Assuming we get De Bruyne, whose place in the team does he take?