Pellers press conference

[Proelia]

Re: Pellers press confernce

Angle? Why would they have an angle?! You do realise we are one of 4 clubs they now use in their ads? We are on their billboards, the SSN ads - anything. Sky have as much interest in promoting us now as they do United, because we are big news the world over. Why alienate one club to concentrate on what another brings, when you can have both on board? They really do have no reason to have an agenda against the club, none whatsoever. We are now above the mighty Liverpool in the eyes of the footballing community, and Liverpool were the other club people on here used to be paranoid about too.

Do you ever fuck off

No, i'm here to stay. Is that ok with you?

No

 

[mat]

Re: Pellers press confernce

Kolo and Mignolet press conference instead.

 

[St Helens Blue (Exiled)]

Re: Pellers press confernce

Do you ever fuck off

No need at all....

-- Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:32 pm --

I would say theirs had a greater profile than ours, since it's a manager that has come from the same league and the fact it's united's first managerial presentation in 26 years.

Ok-You keep believing that!

What part of that statement is inaccurate?

Show me where I called your statement inaccurate please Mark.I just said you keep believing what you like.

 

[mkblue]

Re: Pellers press confernce

where can I watch it,tried sun and mirror links but nothing

I'm Watching it here

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/5006710/Manuel-Pellegrini-Press-conference-watch-live-video-here.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... -here.html</a>

 

[Pigeonho]

Re: Pellers press confernce

Pidge-Explain this mate and be honest.
Moyes news conference-Sky all over it for weeks shown live from start to finish
Pellegrini news conference-Fuck all.

What if City didn't allow them in, for whatever reason? Not suggesting that is what has happened, but what if it was for that reason?
A poster just said Wolves' PC was shown live, does that mean Sky love Wolves more than us? Maybe they are preparing a huge article on it later, and want to do it more justice than the long, drawn out process are live conference can be? Who knows? What I do know is there is no reason to not show it out of spite, which is what is being suggested here.

James Cooper-Sky sports news was there asking questions.It's biased as fuck mate.If you can't see that then fair does pal. As I said,I can't wait to smash this league this year.

Then i have no idea. Why do you think they aren't broadcasting it? Do you think that they think that if they don't show it, it isn't happening and they can just live in United land? There will be a reason they aren't showing it, a real reason and not one conjured up from the minds of paranoid City fans who seem to have more of a problem with our new fame than the news outlets they accuse of the very same thing.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Re: Pellers press confernce

Lol. Do you seriously believe Sky aren't showing it because it's us? There will be a reason why, and no one on here knows what it is. I can promise you now though that it isn't to A) blank us or B) to make us look cunts.

You've got to laugh at the sheer paranoia out of some of you at times.

To be fair to SSN (which is rare). The fulham story breaking as well as the ashes may have put the conference down the pecking order. Will still be interested to see what angle they edit it though.

Angle? Why would they have an angle?! You do realise we are one of 4 clubs they now use in their ads? We are on their billboards, the SSN ads - anything. Sky have as much interest in promoting us now as they do United, because we are big news the world over. Why alienate one club to concentrate on what another brings, when you can have both on board? They really do have no reason to have an agenda against the club, none whatsoever. We are now above the mighty Liverpool in the eyes of the footballing community, and Liverpool were the other club people on here used to be paranoid about too.

Your argument is, as usual, predicated on the basis that the "agenda" operates on an organised, fully conscious basis. It does not.

It exists, in the main, subconsciously, for historical and financial reasons, but exists it most certainly does.

You've never struck me as especially naive :-)

 

[Pigeonho]

Re: Pellers press confernce

Do you ever fuck off

No, i'm here to stay. Is that ok with you?

No

You know what to do then.

 

[Hart of the Matter]

Re: Pellers press confernce

Perhaps we didn't invite them?

 

[citysix]

Re: Pellers press confernce

would love to bang that nonce james cooper out

 

[St Helens Blue (Exiled)]

Re: Pellers press confernce

To be fair to SSN (which is rare). The fulham story breaking as well as the ashes may have put the conference down the pecking order. Will still be interested to see what angle they edit it though.

Angle? Why would they have an angle?! You do realise we are one of 4 clubs they now use in their ads? We are on their billboards, the SSN ads - anything. Sky have as much interest in promoting us now as they do United, because we are big news the world over. Why alienate one club to concentrate on what another brings, when you can have both on board? They really do have no reason to have an agenda against the club, none whatsoever. We are now above the mighty Liverpool in the eyes of the footballing community, and Liverpool were the other club people on here used to be paranoid about too.

Your argument is, as usual, predicated on the basis that the "agenda" operates on an organised, fully conscious basis. It does not.

It exists, in the main, subconsciously, for historical and financial reasons, but exists it most certainly does.

You've never struck me as especially naive :-)
Your agument is, as usual, predicated on the basis that this "agenda" operates on an organised, conscious basis. It does not.

It exists subconsciously for historical, f

I'm not clever enough to post stuff like that..but I agree with this..