Thanks for a reasoned response.
Was Chelsea a real change of tactics or an opportunist response by the players to their suicidal high line and sloppy defending? Ironically, we exploited it the same way as many have cut through ours. Whatever, Arsenal brought us back down to Earth with a bump.
Fair comments about Pep’s private life possibly having a bearing.
Oh I think to be fair with Chelsea I meant more the way he moved the full backs very high and then had Marmoush and Haaland dropping and running in behind alternately. Gvardiol was left back but he kept breaking behind their defensive line in the first half. Nunes actually put in a couple of good crosses from the right which isn't like him.
Agree their high line was suicidal but I gave Pep credit for adjusting to that in game cos we saw a noticeable adjustment in the second half. If that was just improvisation by the players then why didn't they do it in the first half?
They did fall to shit against Arsenal but you were originally asking for evidence of him trying to adjust so that's what I'm pointing out. I'm not saying he's solved it yet but I think it's not reasonable to say he's not showing signs of trying to fix the issues.
More generally I don't care if he doesn't fix it this season. One bad season in nine makes him easily the best City manager of my entire lifetime twice over.