And could barely keep a straight face when he said it?Why pretend it is when the bloke said he is staying.
At this point you can't seriously still believe he is staying?
And could barely keep a straight face when he said it?Why pretend it is when the bloke said he is staying.
And could barely keep a straight face when he said it?
At this point you can't seriously still believe he is staying?
Well let’s hope his spell at Chelsea goes the same way as that at Real Madrid :-)There's not much he could do if he was sacked. None of the important trophies were won the season before he went . It was an ageing side . Guardiola won nothing in his first season here things take some time.
He was virtually unbeaten for a season with Leverkusen.
I'm not unhappy with Maresca but Alonso's record impresses.
Club doesn’t let it bother them because:I've never seen anyone from the club other than Pep in front of the media's headlights.
Certainty agree with your last sentence though
Regardless of whether the verdict of the enquiry is released the new manager can say WTF are you asking me for I wasn’t here?Hopefully these charges are fucked off soon and the cnuts have only football questions to ask the new manager
Still upset that Brian from Gorton was sacked :)I’ve still not got over Tony Book being sacked so fuck knows how long it’ll take to recover from this :)
Wallace is a little shit stain! Another who should be banned from stepping foot in the etihad!Hope this isn’t true:
: Chelsea are shaping up for a LEGAL BATTLE with Manchester City over Enzo Maresca!
The allegation that Maresca had told Chelsea’s ownership that he was in talks with City has not been disputed. The expectation is that Chelsea will seek compensation from City, with the added threat of disclosure about the terms of Maresca’s departure from Stamford Bridge, and the events in the months leading up to it.
For any action to be brought against City it is understood that a complaint would have to be made by Chelsea to the Premier League, which would then be obliged to investigate under the terms of its own rules. The legal case Chelsea have in that regard will unfold when Maresca’s appointment is made official.
Sam Wallace
Fuck me more mud for the sour cunts in the press to chuck at us.Hope this isn’t true:
: Chelsea are shaping up for a LEGAL BATTLE with Manchester City over Enzo Maresca!
The allegation that Maresca had told Chelsea’s ownership that he was in talks with City has not been disputed. The expectation is that Chelsea will seek compensation from City, with the added threat of disclosure about the terms of Maresca’s departure from Stamford Bridge, and the events in the months leading up to it.
For any action to be brought against City it is understood that a complaint would have to be made by Chelsea to the Premier League, which would then be obliged to investigate under the terms of its own rules. The legal case Chelsea have in that regard will unfold when Maresca’s appointment is made official.
Sam Wallace
Hope this isn’t true:
: Chelsea are shaping up for a LEGAL BATTLE with Manchester City over Enzo Maresca!
The allegation that Maresca had told Chelsea’s ownership that he was in talks with City has not been disputed. The expectation is that Chelsea will seek compensation from City, with the added threat of disclosure about the terms of Maresca’s departure from Stamford Bridge, and the events in the months leading up to it.
For any action to be brought against City it is understood that a complaint would have to be made by Chelsea to the Premier League, which would then be obliged to investigate under the terms of its own rules. The legal case Chelsea have in that regard will unfold when Maresca’s appointment is made official.
Sam Wallace
Chelsea had sacked MarescaHope this isn’t true:
: Chelsea are shaping up for a LEGAL BATTLE with Manchester City over Enzo Maresca!
The allegation that Maresca had told Chelsea’s ownership that he was in talks with City has not been disputed. The expectation is that Chelsea will seek compensation from City, with the added threat of disclosure about the terms of Maresca’s departure from Stamford Bridge, and the events in the months leading up to it.
For any action to be brought against City it is understood that a complaint would have to be made by Chelsea to the Premier League, which would then be obliged to investigate under the terms of its own rules. The legal case Chelsea have in that regard will unfold when Maresca’s appointment is made official.
Sam Wallace
Great another drawn out drama showHope this isn’t true:
: Chelsea are shaping up for a LEGAL BATTLE with Manchester City over Enzo Maresca!
The allegation that Maresca had told Chelsea’s ownership that he was in talks with City has not been disputed. The expectation is that Chelsea will seek compensation from City, with the added threat of disclosure about the terms of Maresca’s departure from Stamford Bridge, and the events in the months leading up to it.
For any action to be brought against City it is understood that a complaint would have to be made by Chelsea to the Premier League, which would then be obliged to investigate under the terms of its own rules. The legal case Chelsea have in that regard will unfold when Maresca’s appointment is made official.
Sam Wallace
Of course he will leave one day, that doesn’t mean that just because a click fest has started we should believe any of them.Because official or not it's 100% happening so why pretend it isn't?
If there was a clause in Maresca’s contract that made him inform Chelsea of any contact with City, there’s likely to be a release clause in it too, spelling out how much money it would take to go to City.Hope this isn’t true:
: Chelsea are shaping up for a LEGAL BATTLE with Manchester City over Enzo Maresca!
The allegation that Maresca had told Chelsea’s ownership that he was in talks with City has not been disputed. The expectation is that Chelsea will seek compensation from City, with the added threat of disclosure about the terms of Maresca’s departure from Stamford Bridge, and the events in the months leading up to it.
For any action to be brought against City it is understood that a complaint would have to be made by Chelsea to the Premier League, which would then be obliged to investigate under the terms of its own rules. The legal case Chelsea have in that regard will unfold when Maresca’s appointment is made official.
Sam Wallace
Nope he leftChelsea had sacked Maresca
This from Chelsea at the time:Chelsea had sacked Maresca
If I was him, I'd just tell them "i'll talk at FT".Pep's pre match interview tonight might be quite entertaining :-)