Peter Walton..

[Hart of the Matter]

Yeah, I noticed that too.

It was an utterly pathetic and ridiculous thing to come out with.

It’s either a trip or it’s not. There is no such thing as half a trip.

It's either a City player or not.

 

[dickie davies]

Status quo you say. And yet we’ve won the league 3 years out of 4.

The 98 to liverpools 97 point season was case in point of us being absolutely brilliant, as Liverpool got so much help to achieve their points total

 

[kippaxwarrior]

I suggested that a couple of years ago.

Seen to remember years ago people were asking for Pierluigi Collina to ref the Arsenal-Utd Title decider game in 2003 i think as he would show no bias to either team

 

[Gundog’s Gundog]

Peter Walton, not agreed with much if any of his expert opinions. Find myself shouting 'WANKER' at the TV

I think that’s a reflex action, I have the same problem regardless of whether I agree with him or not.

 

[Xhavenjoe]

It’s either a trip or it’s not. There is no such thing as half a trip

Have you flown Ryanair

 

[BlueTG]

Cheers lad. If UEFA don't think Lahoz was the best ref this season then why give him the Champs lege final?? Your suggestion was we get foreign refs as they are better than the English ones. You have provided zero evidence of this. Not saying ours are the best by any means but what I've seen the majority in Europe are no better. A lot of these countries have their refs trained by ours.

He got the final as his swansong from refereeing club football. Sentiment.

 

[richardtheref]

Only announced his official retirement 04/06 which I understand was after the CL final.

 

[Mancity1980]

Seen to remember years ago people were asking for Pierluigi Collina to ref the Arsenal-Utd Title decider game in 2003 i think as he would show no bias to either team

Now he was a referee, the like we have never seen in the EPL.

 

[old blue]

Ampidou sent off and Walton pontificating as only he can about why he should have been sent off. It was a mirror image of the incident with Raheem when the loon was adamant that there was hardly a touch therefore no foul. For a programme that is supposed to know all about football not one has flagged up the double standards of Walton.

 

[richardtheref]

Ampidou sent off and Walton pontificating as only he can about why he should have been sent off. It was a mirror image of the incident with Raheem when the loon was adamant that there was hardly a touch therefore no foul. For a programme that is supposed to know all about football not one has flagged up the double standards of Walton.

He was only pontificating/waffling in case VAR reversed the decision. Simply buying time before agreeing with what the real experts come up with