crazyg
Well-Known Member
It wasn't very (a)cute.Obtuse?
It wasn't very (a)cute.Obtuse?
AcuteObtuse?
While that is no doubt true, it would take away the plain bent Refs we now have, who favour two teams who will remain nameless...Good points,
The system is producing referees that are not up to standard.
Are the EFL refs any better?
Some of us believed VAR would make things transparent, but thats become even more corrupt than the ref and two assistantsWhile that is no doubt true, it would take away the plain bent Refs we now have, who favour two teams who will remain nameless...
Tony Harrington is very good. We shall see if the PL's "interpretations" ruin him. Only problem is him being a Boro fan.![]()
Four new referees for 2021/22 Premier League
PGMOL confirms new officials have been promoted to Select Group 1 ahead of the new seasonwww.premierleague.com
Next set of bent cunts announced. I hope the Aussie isn't.
While that is no doubt true, it would take away the plain bent Refs we now have, who favour two teams who will remain nameless...
Institutional biasWhen you say "bent", who do you accuse?
Is it the refs taking bribes, the institution taking bribes?
What exactly is it you know, believe or think is happening?
It is not just the winning of trophies, it is being there or thereabouts and the publicity that goes with it. We all know, perhaps through a blue tint, that without penalties they both would have been miles behind.So are you saying the premier league executives tell referees that they have to show bias or cheat, to get a job,
All the refs , at a general meeting, just the one or two ?
What I am trying to get at , is how it operates this bent system ?
What are your thoughts , because that quote, really doesn't work for me. Rags have won fuck all for a while and if the bent refs have failed so miserably, they wouldn't be paid their bung
It is not just the winning of trophies, it is being there or thereabouts and the publicity that goes with it. We all know, perhaps through a blue tint, that without penalties they both would have been miles behind.
It might be as simple as unconscious bias. We know that we are on a loser when head lines are being formulated.Same question, is there money changing hands, who is telling the refs to cheat?
Who is paying who?
If I was committing a crime ( I am not) I would want considerable payback.
When I ask this question , I never get a reply.
It might be as simple as unconscious bias. We know that we are on a loser when head lines are being formulated.
It doesn't have to be financial recompense. It could be extortion or bribery.Same question, is there money changing hands, who is telling the refs to cheat?
Who is paying who?
If I was committing a crime ( I am not) I would want considerable payback.
When I ask this question , I never get a reply.
It doesn't have to be financial recompense. It could be extortion or bribery.
Maybe it's not money, it's career progressionSo who do you think may be bribing the referees ?
How do the bribers, extortionists, keep it hidden ?
What success have the extortionists made, ?
Look at what happened with Hansie Cronje the South African cricket captain. Some gambling syndicate had him in their grip and he did their bidding on the field. And once you've done it once they have you because if you refuse a second time...So who do you think may be bribing the referees ?
How do the bribers, extortionists, keep it hidden ?
What success have the extortionists made, ?
If it was extortion or bribery it would be impossible to conceal, I will stick to unconscious bias.So who do you think may be bribing the referees ?
How do the bribers, extortionists, keep it hidden ?
What success have the extortionists made, ?
It might be as simple as unconscious bias. We know that we are on a loser when head lines are being formulated.
I’ll stick with institutional bias in order to keep the coin rolling in.If it was extortion or bribery it would be impossible to conceal, I will stick to unconscious bias.