PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Pam]

Rags, Arsenal, Chelsea and Spurs now all failed to win since announcement. Suck on that you twats.

To hell fire with all of them.

 

[abu13]

From a FFP perspective, because it was counted in the accounts as it was loaned. Loan 100M? Put 100M on the accounts as owner investment. If Abramovich wanted to run a company with a loan out of 1.5B, that's up to him.

The writing it off makes no difference to FFP.

And this is why I am baffled, why would we need to supposedly inflate sponsorship when we could have just asked the owner for a loan of £100 million.

 

[iceman]

Let's just win the league that champs league the fa cup and the charges against us then stick 2 fingers up to the lot of them

 

[117 M34]

I’m sure others will have different views, but Paddy Power take the absolute piss out of everyone and are normally pretty funny with it.

Out of all the media, at least they are consistent

Yeah I have no problem with paddy Power doing something.
If the rags or Liverpool were in the same situation they would do it to them too.

 

[wolviedinho]

And this is why I am baffled, why would we need to supposedly inflate sponsorship when we could have just asked the owner for a loan of £100 million.

Or even better. Why did we not just flood the club with debt. It is acceptable after all.

Oh no we would rather create a nationwide scandal and deceive the accounts. The accusations get sillier and sillier under any sort of scrutiny.

 

[LesBleuMiserable]

Let's just win the league that champs league the fa cup and the charges against us then stick 2 fingers up to the lot of them

We could melt the cups and do an educational video to demonstrate the mineral form of the periodic table!

 

[abu13]

Or even better. Why did we not just flood the club with debt. It is acceptable after all.

And at a 0% interest rate as well.

 

[waspish]

 

[wolviedinho]

And at a 0% interest rate as well.

Or a balance transfer to Abu Dhabi’s 1st national bank!

 

[JewelZee]

Ultimatley this is what FFP aims to do, block over investment from an owner - none of us agree with it and its a load of shit.

However if the club is proven to have breached the FFP laws which we signed up to, theres not a lot we can do.

"Breeched" or worked tirelessly with progressive and creative ways to generate revenues? I firmly believe the cartel clubs thought they had it on lockdown and we proved that to not be the case. If what City did was a breech then why the need to change and implement new rules upon Newcastle being bought? Because City proved their restrictions weren't great enough for the cartel's needs thus the need to implement further restrictions. So we basically "breeched" rules that did not actually exist otherwise why exactly were "new" rules needed to ensure Newcastle could not do the same thing. Any of these negative legal experts on here care to explain that?