You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
not my fault!
Well-Known Member
It wasn’t a charge, someone said it and it stuck! We have not been charged with having long grass.Is the grass being the wrong length still a charge or was that one of the errors?
Blueknows
Well-Known Member
That's 6 rules times 9 years thats half the charges out the window already lolThis just sums them up. If they make mistakes like that in the inquiry we will eat them alive.
SilverFox2
Well-Known Member
Seems to me he was sarcastically saying ne agreed with the media at the time who suggested that incident was responsible for our PL title ignoring all our seasons hard work.I know we all find it funny but I wonder why he felt the need to mention slippy? That more than anything else he said will get the media up in arms. They fucking love that fanny wipe.
D
D
Deleted member 77198
Guest
I found that bit interesting where - just after he said twice that he ‘will never forget what the nine have done, never forget what the nine have done’ (get the fuck out of Burnley for fuck’s sake Vinny!) - Pep said when he was at Bayern he was listening to what they were saying and it was built from day one… I interpreted that to mean that Bayern were also trying to build the same case against City as the nine.
Last edited by a moderator:
jaiguruKun
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Mar 2011
- Messages
- 5,757
No time barring - how far back can you go?
Seriously is it 1992 when the prem league formed? Pep made a point about a precedent being set so that’s a lot of dirt that could well be brought up. Corruption from match fixing, bribery, lobbying, collusion etc etc don’t tell me it’s not been happening.
I’m really intrigued what could come up. If the lid comes off could this be like a “me too” moment with scandals & jail sentences.
Who knows, maybe even knighthoods could be stripped.
On what basis are the media saying there is no time barring? Given that the charges have to be decided based on English law which has a limitation period of 6 years I find that difficult to understand. Is it simply wishful thinking?
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,655
On what basis are the media saying there is no time barring? Given that the charges have to be decided based on English law which has a limitation period of 6 years I find that difficult to understand. Is it simply wishful thinking?
Theyve gone back to 2009.
Sorry, I read the words “replacing the PL” as replacing the PL in its entirety.I did Not say the premier league will disappear, just the interested parties agenda. That is the point of an independent regulator.
It is because the 6 year clock I believe starts ticking from when the issue was discovered not when they were alleged to have occurredOn what basis are the media saying there is no time barring? Given that the charges have to be decided based on English law which has a limitation period of 6 years I find that difficult to understand. Is it simply wishful thinking?