PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[halfcenturyup]

View attachment 68905

"I see people who reply to their own posts. They don't even know they are replying to their own posts".

 

[halfcenturyup]

"I see people who reply to their own posts. They don't even know they are replying to their own posts".

You got that right!

Oh Damn. :(

 

[eastmanc]

I don't always agree with Simon Jordan, but he's right when he says that the wage bills for the players are unsustainable (and unjustifiable?). This fact and agents' fees are a major factor in clubs' demise.
I'm waiting for certain clubs' bubbles to burst...

I can't state this any stronger but FUCK SIMON JORDAN.

 

[cityontheup]

Surely!

That’s right but don’t call me surely again

 

[not my fault!]

Nope, the papers are not wrong. It is libel when broadcast.

Then the 19 clubs each need to release a statement counter to Pep’s claims. They can’t say his words are libellous without backing up their belief is the entire opposite. We know they want us punished, they know it too so no chance we get Liverpool or Arsenal releasing statements suggesting they feel City should be treated innocent until proven guilty. Ergo it’s not liable as he’s stated fact, it’s for them to prove they believe so etching different to what Pep stated.

 

[argyle]

View attachment 68869

This is a made up quote. The first bit I think he said but the rest is not true.

 

[eastmanc]

I caught Reddy saying that the charges don't relate to breaking FFP rules but PL rules without highlighting which rules have been broken, with a tone that we're guilty because we've been accused.

What rules, has she made this up.

 

[not my fault!]

This is a made up quote. The first bit I think he said but the rest is not true.

I keep seeing this “the first bit is true” but where does said first bit end? After the first sentence or??? While I realise it’s bullshit, it’d be handy to know the exact bits that are true.

 

[MillionMilesAway]

Then the 19 clubs each need to release a statement counter to Pep’s claims. They can’t say his words are libellous without backing up their belief is the entire opposite. We know they want us punished, they know it too so no chance we get Liverpool or Arsenal releasing statements suggesting they feel City should be treated innocent until proven guilty. Ergo it’s not liable as he’s stated fact, it’s for them to prove they believe so etching different to what Pep stated.

Not sure the clubs have said anything have they, certainly not with an attributable name attached.

 

[mccity]

Yep that's what I mean

Cause here makes no sense
'Cause or 'cos would have been correct

Dont mean to be pedantic but other fans will just see it as an error and not the point of it

Cause without an apostrophe is perfectly acceptable in informal British English.

It's the same with the word ain't.